Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-5.1 Chat by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT-5.1 Chat is 3.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-5.1 Chat is cheaper on both — 4.8× input, 3.0× output
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 180.6x more headings
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-5.1 Chat by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT-5.1 Chat is 3.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-5.1 Chat is cheaper on both — 4.8× input, 3.0× output
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 180.6x more headings