Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 51 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
10× cheaper
Output
$0.79
38× cheaper
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both — 10× input, 38× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 180.6x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
61%Vocabulary51%
49wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.46
2.2Bold3.4
4.5Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.00
0.21Transitions0.06
Based on 21 + 15 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
