Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.1vsGLM 4.7
Updated Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.1vsGLM 4.7

GLM 4.7 is the newer model, released after Claude Opus 4.1.

Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 4.7 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.1GLM 4.7
Input price$15/M tokens—
Output price$75/M tokens—
Context window200K tokens—
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2025
SWE-bench Verified74.5%73.8%
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
GLM 4.7
GLM 4.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
GLM 4.7
Input
—
Output
—
Where to run it

9 hosts, cheapest first

Claude Opus 4.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·100% up
GLM 4.77 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.40 in·$1.75 out·203k·97.2% upVVenicefp4$0.55 in·$2.65 out·198k·94.1% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.60 in·$2.20 out·200k·99.9% upMMancerfp4$0.70 in·$2.50 out·131k·92.4% upAAtlasCloudfp8degraded$0.52 in·$1.85 out·203k·91.3% upNNovitafp8degraded$0.54 in·$1.98 out·205k·93.9% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
Z.aifp4degraded$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·74.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
33%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 7.3x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.1
GLM 4.7
63%Vocabulary54%
64wSentence Length16w
0.72Hedging0.26
4.5Bold5.4
5.3Lists3.9
0.81Emoji0.11
1.42Headings0.48
0.16Transitions0.07
Based on 26 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M3 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGPT-5 logo
GLM 4.7 vs GPT-5New provider
GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
Claude Opus 4.1 logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider
GLM 4.7 logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
GLM 4.7 vs Grok 3 ThinkingNew provider
GLM 4.7 logoGrok 4 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Grok 4New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
GLM 4.7 vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed