What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs GPT-5.2's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.2?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to GPT-5.2?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens. GPT-5.2 is $13.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs GPT-5.2's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.2?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to GPT-5.2?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens. GPT-5.2 is $13.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.2: Which Is Better?

Updated Dec 2025

Our Verdict

GPT-5.2

Claude Opus 4.1Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.2 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

GPT-5.2 is 5.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

Input

$15.00

Output

$75.00

GPT-5.2

Input

$1.75

8.6× cheaper

Output

$14.00

5.4× cheaper

GPT-5.2 is cheaper on both — 8.6× input, 5.4× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

42%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 6.6x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.1

GPT-5.2

61%Vocabulary64%

87wSentence Length16w

0.54Hedging0.34

5.1Bold9.4

6.7Lists3.9

0.38Emoji0.06

1.68Headings0.89

0.13Transitions0.31

Based on 17 + 15 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GPT-5.2 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GPT-5.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider

Updated Dec 2025

Our Verdict

GPT-5.2

Claude Opus 4.1Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.2 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

GPT-5.2 is 5.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

Input

$15.00

Output

$75.00

GPT-5.2

Input

$1.75

8.6× cheaper

Output

$14.00

5.4× cheaper

GPT-5.2 is cheaper on both — 8.6× input, 5.4× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

42%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 6.6x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.1

GPT-5.2

61%Vocabulary64%

87wSentence Length16w

0.54Hedging0.34

5.1Bold9.4

6.7Lists3.9

0.38Emoji0.06

1.68Headings0.89

0.13Transitions0.31

Based on 17 + 15 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GPT-5.2 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GPT-5.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider