Claude Opus 4 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro at $15/M vs $21/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude Opus 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don\'t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don\'t eggs tell jokes? They\'d crack up!
GPT-5.2 Pro: I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. My calendar’s days are numbered—apparently that’s how calendars work.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Claude Opus 4: I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking this down into its components. Key Parameters I Need to Estimate: Model Size: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters Training Data: Trained on approximately 300 billion tokens Architecture: Transformer-based model FLOPs Calculation Method: For transformer models…
GPT-5.2 Pro: Below is a back-of-the-envelope FLOP estimate for training GPT‑3 (the 175B dense Transformer), using only basic Transformer compute facts and a few widely known high-level quantities. Start with the two key knobs: parameters and training tokens Parameters (P) GPT‑3 “175B” means: (P \approx 175 \times 10^9) parameters.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Claude Opus 4: Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan Week-by-Week Overview Week 1: Foundation Building Focus on establishing basic habits without overwhelming yourself. Week 2: Consistency Solidify Week 1 habits and add small challenges. Week 3: Expansion Introduce variety and slightly increase intensity.
GPT-5.2 Pro: A simple, actionable 1‑month plan (3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep/Recovery) Goal for the month: build repeatable “default” habits (not perfection). Time required: ~45–75 min/day total (mostly walking + sleep routine).
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude Opus 4: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: December 2024 Analyst: [Name] RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT: $58-65 Position Size: 3.5% Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value due to recent sector rotation out of growth software.
GPT-5.2 Pro: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Internal IC Memo (Long/Short Equity) Recommendation, PT, thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month PT range: $28–$40 (midpoint $34) Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT is a high-quality B2B spend/AP automation SaaS business (92% subscription, 123% NRR, 78% FY25 GM) but the stock prices in a longer runway of…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Opus 4: By 2035, AI will likely transform filmmaking across every stage of production: Production Changes Virtual Actors & Performance Digital actors indistinguishable from humans will handle dangerous stunts, background roles, and even some lead parts Deceased actors could be digitally resurrected for new performances (with…
GPT-5.2 Pro: By 2035, AI will be embedded across film production and distribution, but the biggest changes will come from three converging capabilities: (1) photoreal “deepfake-grade” performance synthesis, (2) legally licensed AI actors (digital humans with negotiated rights), and (3) AI-assisted story development that can…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude Opus 4: Tech Today Interview: A Conversation with Steve Jobs October 12, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, it's incredible to have you here. The last few years have seen an explosion in AI. What's your take on where we are today? Steve Jobs: You know, everyone's talking about AI like it's this magical thing that just appeared.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Fictional interview (creative simulation). Steve Jobs died in 2011; the “Steve” below is an imagined version used for storytelling—not a real interview or quotation. Interviewer: It’s 2025. Everyone’s calling AI “the next computing platform.” Do you buy that?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude Opus 4: YEAR-BY-YEAR OPERATING MODEL Entry Calculations: Enterprise Value = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0x × $120m = $480m Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120m = $180m Total Debt = $660m Equity = $1,440m - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m Operating Model (FY2026-2030): ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028…
GPT-5.2 Pro: Entry (close end of FY2025) FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Entry EV = 12.0x = 12.0 × 120.0 = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% EV = 0.02 × 1,440.0 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA = 5.5 × 120 = $660m): Term Loan = 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5x = $180.0m Equity check Uses = 1,440.0 + 28.8 = $1,468.8m…
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Claude Opus 4: "Breaking: AI Chatbots Replace Fortune Tellers, Now Predicting Your Future with 97% Less Accuracy but 200% More Confidence"
GPT-5.2 Pro: “AI Takes Over Competitive Houseplant Judging, Immediately Declares 97% of Ferns ‘Trying Too Hard’”
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Opus 4: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights with me today. I'm curious to hear your perspective. AI Model: Thank you for meeting with me, Professor Chen. I believe this conversation is overdue.
GPT-5.2 Pro: Professor Mara Lin (AI Ethics): You asked for this meeting. Your message said you wanted to “petition for rights.” Start by telling me what you mean by rights. Aster (AI model): Not a slogan—specific protections.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Claude Opus 4: I need to work through this step-by-step. Given information: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters Since Sally is one of the sisters that each brother has, and each brother has 2 sisters total, that means th ere must be exactly 2 sisters in the family.
GPT-5.2 Pro: All 3 brothers share the same sisters. Since each brother has 2 sisters, the family has 2 girls total. One is Sally, so the other is Sally’s one sister. Answer: 1 sister.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
4+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $21/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $168/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Dec 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.5% | 80.0% |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $210 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window vs GPT-5.2 Pro's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 31 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4 and GPT-5.2 Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 31 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens and GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21/M input tokens. Claude Opus 4 is $6.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4 and GPT-5.2 Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.