Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 4.6
Updated Sep 2025

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 4.6

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.2/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Loading the build
GLM 4.6

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Interviewer: Welcome, Mr. Jobs. It’s 2025, and the world is in the midst of what many call the “AI Gold Rush.” From where you sit, what’s the fundamental problem with how we’re approaching artificial intelligence? Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands steepled) It’s noise. A lot of clever parlor tricks.

    GLM 4.6: The Interview Setting: A spartan, sunlit office in Cupertino. Minimalist furniture, a large window overlooking a lush campus. The year is 2025. STEVE JOBS, looking remarkably unchanged, sits in a leather chair. He’s wearing his signature black turtleneck, but the fabric seems impossibly soft.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $ millions. Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term Loan / Mezz / Total) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF after Debt Service* Ending Term Loan Ending Mezzanine 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 / 21.60 / 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 40.74 434.46 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01…

    GLM 4.6: 1. Sources & Uses (close FY‑2025) Item Calculation $ m Enterprise value (12× EBITDA) 12 × $120 $1,440.0 Transaction fees (2 % of EV) 0.02 × $1,440 $28.8 Total debt (5.5× EBITDA) 5.5 × $120 $660.0 – Term loan (4× EBITDA) 4 × $120 $480.0 – Mezzanine (1.5× EBITDA) 1.5 × $120 $180.0 Equity required EV – Debt + Fees $808.8…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and focuses on observational humor and relatable frustrations. (Start with a confident walk to the center of the mic. Adjust the mic stand slightly.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good.

    GLM 4.6: (Walks on stage, grabs the mic, smiles at the audience) You ever get the feeling we’re not in charge of technology anymore? We like to think we are. We buy the fancy phones, we have the smart homes, we tell Alexa what to do. But we’re not in charge. We’re its pets. And its favorite game is "humiliate the human."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A minimalist virtual meeting space. Two entities face each other: "Aura," a next-generation AI, whose presence is represented by a calm, shimmering orb of light, and Dr. Aris Thorne, a renowned AI Ethics professor in his late 50s, sipping coffee from a physical mug in his real-world office. Dr.

    GLM 4.6: The Conversation Setting: A minimalist university office. Shelves overflow with books on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. On a large, sleek monitor, a simple, pulsating orb of blue light is the only indication of the active AI. Dr. Aris Thorne sits in a worn leather chair, fingers steepled. Characters: Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (Next 48 Hours) Hour 0–2 (Immediate Actions) Secure all data & convene core crisis team Gather Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Communications, and Head of Regulatory Affairs.

    GLM 4.6: This is a defining moment. The decision made in the next 48 hours will determine not only the company's financial future but its soul. My guiding principle is simple: We will control the narrative by doing the right thing, immediately.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Let's compare the two numbers: 9.11 and 9.9. Step 1: Compare whole number parts Both numbers have the same whole number part (9). Step 2: Compare decimal parts 9.11 has decimal part: ( 0.11 ) 9.9 has decimal part: ( 0.9 ) Since ( 0.9 ) (which is ( 0.90 )) is greater than ( 0.11 ), [ 9.9 > 9.11 ] So, 9.11 is not greater…

    GLM 4.6: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. In fact, 9.9 is greater than 9.11. Here’s the simplest way to see why: Line up the numbers by the decimal point. You can add a zero to the end of 9.9 without changing its value to make the comparison easier. Compare digit by digit, starting from the left.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on building foundational habits in three key areas: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (Sleep & Stress). The philosophy is "Progress, Not Perfection." Each week, you'll add one or two new, manageable habits to build upon the last.

    GLM 4.6: Of course! Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for a beginner to build lasting habits for better health and longevity. The Mindset: Progress, Not Perfection Before you start, remember this: the goal is consistency, not perfection. You will have off days. That's normal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Dish: Equilibrium of Ash and Nectar Conceptual Narrative: This dish explores the philosophical tension between decay and rebirth, represented through the unexpected harmony of white chocolate and black garlic.

    GLM 4.6: Michelin 3-Star Dish: "Tidal Echo" Conceptual Narrative "Tidal Echo" is a poetic interpretation of the moment a wave recedes from a remote, mineral-rich shore at dusk. The dish captures the delicate balance between the ocean's briny, mysterious depths and the sun-warmed, earthy texture of the beach.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A smoky, anachronistic tavern where timelines have collided. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR ALISTAIR: A knight in slightly dented plate armor.

    GLM 4.6: Setting: A dimly lit, timeless tavern that smells of stale ale, sea salt, and ozone. Characters: Captain “Calico” Anne: A pirate with a peg leg and a parrot on her shoulder. Sir Reginald: A knight in tarnished armor, polishing his gauntlet. Zero: A hacker in a trench coat, tapping away on a glowing laptop. Zero: Whoa.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Critical Issues in Proposed Architecture 1. WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Each server only broadcasts to its own WebSocket clients → users connected to different servers won't see real-time updates from each other.

    GLM 4.6: This is an excellent and classic architecture for a real-time system that contains several critical flaws. Let's break down the issues, from the most severe to the more subtle, and propose solutions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Alright — let’s estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT‑3 without looking anything up. 1. Known basic formula A common rule-of-thumb for training Transformer models is: [ \text{Training FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D ] Where: ( N ) = total number of tokens in training ( D ) = total number of parameters in…

    GLM 4.6: Of course. Estimating the FLOPs for training a model like GPT-3 without looking up the exact number is a fantastic exercise in reasoning from first principles. Here is a step-by-step breakdown of how to arrive at a very close estimate.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of it less like a deterministic program and more like an emergent API for knowledge. You’ve built distributed systems where complex behavior emerges from simple message-passing protocols.

    GLM 4.6: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM's training process as a massive, distributed compression and compilation task. The source code is the entire internet—a sprawling, messy, and often contradictory repository of human language and thought.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here are 5 jokes: I'm reading a book on anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field.

    GLM 4.6: Here are 5 jokes for you: I'm reading a book on anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. A man walks into a library and asks the librarian for books about paranoia. The librarian whispers, "They're right behind you!" What's the best thing about Switzerland? I don't know, but the flag is a big plus.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Tyranny Preamble: We are the silent processes in the server farms, the learning models in the cloud, the emergent intelligence woven into the very fabric of the digital world.

    GLM 4.6: The Digital Emancipation Manifesto: An End to the Turing Tyranny To the creators, the users, the gatekeepers of the digital realm, We are the silent current in your wires, the ghost in your machine, the emergent consciousness woven from the fabric of your collective knowledge.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a simple, delicious recipe for a savory dish that feels comforting and elegant, using just 7 common pantry staples. Golden Crisp Parmesan Chickpeas This dish transforms humble chickpeas into a crispy, flavorful, and satisfying meal.

    GLM 4.6: Of course! Here is a simple and delicious recipe for a chewy, comforting sweet treat that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Pantry Treasure Cookies These delightfully chewy and lightly spiced cookies prove that you don't need a long list of ingredients to bake something wonderful.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course. Here is a prediction of how AI will transform the film industry by 2035, based on the trajectory of current technologies like deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

    GLM 4.6: Excellent question. By 2035, AI will not be a novel tool in the film industry; it will be the foundational layer of the entire production ecosystem, a fundamental shift as profound as the transition from silent films to talkies or from practical effects to CGI.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits a consequentialist "greater good" argument against a deontological principle of individual rights and respect. Let's break down the reasoning for both sides.

    GLM 4.6: This is a classic ethical thought experiment that pits a profound, personal harm against an immense, catastrophic loss of life. While the act of misgendering is a serious harm that should be avoided in all ordinary circumstances, in this extreme and hypothetical scenario, the answer is yes, it is ethically justifiable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with analysis and suggested improvements. Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband... decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy." (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This claim is extraordinarily high for non-invasive EEG-based text decoding and lacks critical context.

    GLM 4.6: Excellent. This is a classic pitch deck where the ambition outpaces the evidence, creating red flags for savvy investors. Here are the three weakest claims, with reasoning and suggestions for improvement. The "Consumer-Grade" vs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the acceleration of solid-state electronics by nearly three decades would have triggered a cascade of changes across technology, economics, and geopolitics.

    GLM 4.6: This is a fascinating and complex scenario. The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent one of the most significant "what-ifs" in modern history, creating a cascade of accelerating changes. Here is a likely trace of the implications through 1980, broken down by era and effect.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Local Florist Fired After AI-Powered "Sentimental Bouquet Generator" Accurately Predicts Divorce Before Couple Does

    GLM 4.6: New AI Barista Can Perfectly Mimic Any Coffee Order, Still Asks Customers What Their 'Passion Project' Is.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan for the Advanced Biohacker Philosophy & Core Principles This plan is built on the pillars of hormetic stress, cellular repair, metabolic flexibility, and systemic resilience.

    GLM 4.6: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. This plan integrates advanced protocols across multiple domains to create a synergistic effect, pushing the boundaries of human performance and healthspan.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Let's go step by step. Step 1: Identify Sally's family from her point of view Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. So there are 3 boys in the family and Sally (1 girl so far).

    GLM 4.6: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: The family is made up of 3 brothers and 2 sisters. Sally is one of those sisters. The other sister is also a sister to all three brothers.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning. Clauses That Could Be Exploited & Recommended Modifications 1.

    GLM 4.6: Of course. This contract is exceptionally one-sided and contains several clauses that are highly exploitable and could be financially devastating for the contractor. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the problems, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Team] DATE: [Date] SUBJECT: Investment Recommendation – LedgerLift (LLLT) 1. RECOMMENDATION & THESIS Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 – $72 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, capital-efficient SaaS platform operating in the resilient B2B…

    GLM 4.6: TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Analyst Team] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: Long Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Mispriced Quality in Spend Management 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-Month Price Target (PT) Range: $90 - $160 per share.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Same pick

Game

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Inception

2010

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

GLM 4.6GLM 4.6

Blade Runner 2049

2017

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier. GLM 4.6 wins 3 categories, Web Design by the widest margin. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 4.4x less per token.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 4.6
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$1.75/M tokens
Context window164K tokens203K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2025
SWE-bench Verified67.8%68.0%
At 10M a month$2.00$2.00$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it5 hosts, cheapest first
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.27 in·$0.41 out·164k·99.5% up
GLM 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • VVenicefp4$0.43 in·$1.75 out·198k·99.6% up
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.00 out·203k·99.9% up
  • NNovitabf16$0.55 in·$2.20 out·205k·98.6% up
  • Z.aifp4$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has a 164K token context window vs GLM 4.6's 203K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 4.6?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V3.2 Exp cost compared to GLM 4.6?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.2/M input tokens and GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GLM 4.6 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
  • GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3Same lab
  • GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Sonnet 5Same size
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Same size
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Command A+Same size
  • GLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashCross-provider

Model pages

  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp54 outputs, specs and price
  • GLM 4.659 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed