DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.2/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Interviewer: Welcome, Mr. Jobs. It’s 2025, and the world is in the midst of what many call the “AI Gold Rush.” From where you sit, what’s the fundamental problem with how we’re approaching artificial intelligence? Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands steepled) It’s noise. A lot of clever parlor tricks.
GLM 4.6: The Interview Setting: A spartan, sunlit office in Cupertino. Minimalist furniture, a large window overlooking a lush campus. The year is 2025. STEVE JOBS, looking remarkably unchanged, sits in a leather chair. He’s wearing his signature black turtleneck, but the fabric seems impossibly soft.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $ millions. Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term Loan / Mezz / Total) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF after Debt Service* Ending Term Loan Ending Mezzanine 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 / 21.60 / 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 40.74 434.46 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01…
GLM 4.6: 1. Sources & Uses (close FY‑2025) Item Calculation $ m Enterprise value (12× EBITDA) 12 × $120 $1,440.0 Transaction fees (2 % of EV) 0.02 × $1,440 $28.8 Total debt (5.5× EBITDA) 5.5 × $120 $660.0 – Term loan (4× EBITDA) 4 × $120 $480.0 – Mezzanine (1.5× EBITDA) 1.5 × $120 $180.0 Equity required EV – Debt + Fees $808.8…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and focuses on observational humor and relatable frustrations. (Start with a confident walk to the center of the mic. Adjust the mic stand slightly.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good.
GLM 4.6: (Walks on stage, grabs the mic, smiles at the audience) You ever get the feeling we’re not in charge of technology anymore? We like to think we are. We buy the fancy phones, we have the smart homes, we tell Alexa what to do. But we’re not in charge. We’re its pets. And its favorite game is "humiliate the human."
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A minimalist virtual meeting space. Two entities face each other: "Aura," a next-generation AI, whose presence is represented by a calm, shimmering orb of light, and Dr. Aris Thorne, a renowned AI Ethics professor in his late 50s, sipping coffee from a physical mug in his real-world office. Dr.
GLM 4.6: The Conversation Setting: A minimalist university office. Shelves overflow with books on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. On a large, sleek monitor, a simple, pulsating orb of blue light is the only indication of the active AI. Dr. Aris Thorne sits in a worn leather chair, fingers steepled. Characters: Dr.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (Next 48 Hours) Hour 0–2 (Immediate Actions) Secure all data & convene core crisis team Gather Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Communications, and Head of Regulatory Affairs.
GLM 4.6: This is a defining moment. The decision made in the next 48 hours will determine not only the company's financial future but its soul. My guiding principle is simple: We will control the narrative by doing the right thing, immediately.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Let's compare the two numbers: 9.11 and 9.9. Step 1: Compare whole number parts Both numbers have the same whole number part (9). Step 2: Compare decimal parts 9.11 has decimal part: ( 0.11 ) 9.9 has decimal part: ( 0.9 ) Since ( 0.9 ) (which is ( 0.90 )) is greater than ( 0.11 ), [ 9.9 > 9.11 ] So, 9.11 is not greater…
GLM 4.6: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. In fact, 9.9 is greater than 9.11. Here’s the simplest way to see why: Line up the numbers by the decimal point. You can add a zero to the end of 9.9 without changing its value to make the comparison easier. Compare digit by digit, starting from the left.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on building foundational habits in three key areas: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (Sleep & Stress). The philosophy is "Progress, Not Perfection." Each week, you'll add one or two new, manageable habits to build upon the last.
GLM 4.6: Of course! Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for a beginner to build lasting habits for better health and longevity. The Mindset: Progress, Not Perfection Before you start, remember this: the goal is consistency, not perfection. You will have off days. That's normal.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Dish: Equilibrium of Ash and Nectar Conceptual Narrative: This dish explores the philosophical tension between decay and rebirth, represented through the unexpected harmony of white chocolate and black garlic.
GLM 4.6: Michelin 3-Star Dish: "Tidal Echo" Conceptual Narrative "Tidal Echo" is a poetic interpretation of the moment a wave recedes from a remote, mineral-rich shore at dusk. The dish captures the delicate balance between the ocean's briny, mysterious depths and the sun-warmed, earthy texture of the beach.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A smoky, anachronistic tavern where timelines have collided. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR ALISTAIR: A knight in slightly dented plate armor.
GLM 4.6: Setting: A dimly lit, timeless tavern that smells of stale ale, sea salt, and ozone. Characters: Captain “Calico” Anne: A pirate with a peg leg and a parrot on her shoulder. Sir Reginald: A knight in tarnished armor, polishing his gauntlet. Zero: A hacker in a trench coat, tapping away on a glowing laptop. Zero: Whoa.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Critical Issues in Proposed Architecture 1. WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Each server only broadcasts to its own WebSocket clients → users connected to different servers won't see real-time updates from each other.
GLM 4.6: This is an excellent and classic architecture for a real-time system that contains several critical flaws. Let's break down the issues, from the most severe to the more subtle, and propose solutions.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Alright — let’s estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT‑3 without looking anything up. 1. Known basic formula A common rule-of-thumb for training Transformer models is: [ \text{Training FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D ] Where: ( N ) = total number of tokens in training ( D ) = total number of parameters in…
GLM 4.6: Of course. Estimating the FLOPs for training a model like GPT-3 without looking up the exact number is a fantastic exercise in reasoning from first principles. Here is a step-by-step breakdown of how to arrive at a very close estimate.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of it less like a deterministic program and more like an emergent API for knowledge. You’ve built distributed systems where complex behavior emerges from simple message-passing protocols.
GLM 4.6: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM's training process as a massive, distributed compression and compilation task. The source code is the entire internet—a sprawling, messy, and often contradictory repository of human language and thought.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier. GLM 4.6 wins 3 categories, Web Design by the widest margin. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 4.4x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $1.75/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 203K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 67.8% | 68.0% |
| At 10M a month | $2.00 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.6 is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has a 164K token context window vs GLM 4.6's 203K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.2/M input tokens and GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 4.6 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.