GPT-2vsMistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a larger context window than GPT-2 (131K tokens vs 1K tokens).
| Spec | GPT-2 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | — | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 1K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | — | No |
| Released | Nov 2019 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Mistral Medium 3.1
GPT-2Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-2
Input
—
Output
—
Mistral Medium 3.1
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00
Where to run it
1 host
GPT-2
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Mistral Medium 3.11 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
33%
Mistral Medium 3.1 uses 43.0x more hedging
GPT-2
Mistral Medium 3.1
48%Vocabulary54%
36wSentence Length21w
0.00Hedging0.43
0.0Bold10.3
0.0Lists5.7
0.00Emoji0.72
0.00Headings1.03
0.00Transitions0.14
Based on 7 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
GPT-2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT-2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GPT-2 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
GPT-2 vs Grok 4New provider
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-4.1 MiniCross-provider
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-4.1 NanoCross-provider
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-4.5Cross-provider
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-4o (Omni)Cross-provider