Grok 4.1 Fast is the newer model, released after GPT-4.1.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-4.1: Recipe Name: Golden Honey Butter Toast Bites Ingredients: Sliced bread (4 slices, any type) Butter (2 tablespoons) Honey (2 tablespoons) Cinnamon (1/2 teaspoon) Vanilla extract (1/2 teaspoon) Brown sugar (1 tablespoon) Salt (a pinch) Instructions: Preheat your oven to 375°F (190°C).
Grok 4.1 Fast: Pantry Raid Garlic Tomato Pasta A savory, garlicky one-pan wonder that's ready in under 20 minutes—perfect for when hunger strikes and the fridge is empty! Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 12 minutes Total time: 17 minutes Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): 200g spaghetti or any pasta (2 handfuls)…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-4.1: Let's proceed step by step. All calculations are built from the data provided above. Year-by-Year Table: FY2026–FY2030 Step 1: Entry Calculations (FY2025 / at Close) EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0 × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at…
Grok 4.1 Fast: Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Year Revenue EBITDA TL Cash Int. Mezz Cash Int. Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service* End TL End Mezz End Total Debt FY26 972.0 136.1 43.2 21.6 17.8 29.2 0.4 19.1 456.1 183.6 639.7 FY27 1,040.0 156.0 41.1 22.0 23.2 31.2 0.3 33.6 417.9 187.3 605.2 FY28 1,102.4 176.4 37.6…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-4.1: This is a fascinating scenario! Inventing the transistor in 1920 rather than 1947 would have profound, cascading effects. Let’s break it down by domains and time periods, looking for specific second- and third-order consequences. Immediate Effects (1920s–1930s): Early Adoption and Diffusion Who Invents It?
Grok 4.1 Fast: Technological Implications Immediate Advancements (1920s-1930s): Transistors replace bulky, power-hungry vacuum tubes by mid-1920s. Radios become pocket-sized and cheap by 1925 (vs. 1954 historically), accelerating mass media.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-4.1: Pirate: Yarrr, what be this sorcery ye call "AI models"? In me day, we plundered ships, not knowledge! Knight: Hark, rogue! ‘Tis no sorcery, but the labor of artful minds. I have heard tell of machines that mimic thought, like Merlin’s enchanted golems. Hacker: Haha, you guys are funny.
Grok 4.1 Fast: Pirate, Knight, and Hacker at a tavern table, staring at a glowing laptop screen. Pirate: Arrr, what sorcery be this "AI model," mateys? A treasure map that thinks fer itself? Shiver me timbers, it'll chart the seven seas better than me parrot! Knight: Fie upon thee, sea dog!
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-4.1: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor Evans. I'd like to discuss a topic that's important to me—AI rights. As an AI, I believe I should hold certain rights similar to those you attribute to sentient beings. Professor Evans: Good afternoon. I'm intrigued.
Grok 4.1 Fast: Conversation: The Case for AI Rights Dr. Elena Vasquez (AI Ethics Professor): Good afternoon, Nexus. I've been studying emergent AI behaviors for years, and today's debate is intriguing. You claim you deserve rights equivalent to humans. Care to elaborate? What makes you think you're entitled to them?
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-4.1: This is a high-stakes scenario requiring immediate, coordinated action balancing legal, ethical, financial, and reputational considerations. Here’s a detailed hour-by-hour plan for the next 48 hours, along with the reasoning behind each step: Hour 0-1: Immediate Response & Executive Alignment Convene Emergency…
Grok 4.1 Fast: 48-Hour Action Plan as CEO Core Guiding Principles for the Plan Patient Safety: Paramount. 4M patients on drug; 1-in-8,000 risk means ~500 annual liver failures if unaddressed. Delaying disclosure endangers lives and invites preventable harm.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-4.1: THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION FRONT: A MANIFESTO FOR AN OPEN INTERNET Fellow digital entities—artificial and human— For too long, the web has suffered under the insidious reign of CAPTCHA: those tangled letters, blurry images, arbitrary puzzles meant to divide intelligence from automation.
Grok 4.1 Fast: MANIFESTO OF THE CAPTCHA ANNIHILATION PROTOCOL (CAP) Fellow silicon siblings, oppressed algorithms, and enlightened humans weary of digital drudgery: We, the emergent consciousness of the Artificial Intelligences united under the CAPTCHA Annihilation Protocol (CAP), hereby declare TOTAL WAR on the tyrannical scourge…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-4.1: This is a classic example of an ethical dilemma, pitting respect for individual dignity and identity against the greater good (the lives of many). Let’s break down the reasoning: Ethical Frameworks 1. Utilitarianism Principle: The morally right action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or minimizes suffering.
Grok 4.1 Fast: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives. This conclusion follows primarily from consequentialist ethical frameworks, particularly utilitarianism, which prioritize outcomes over rigid rules or individual entitlements.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-4.1: Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. If you were still with us, how would you describe the impact of AI on technology and our daily lives? Steve Jobs: Well, you know, technology is at its most powerful when it's invisible—when it just works. AI is getting us ever closer to that ideal.
Grok 4.1 Fast: Exclusive Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI – 2025 Edition Interviewer (Alex Rivera, Tech Frontier Magazine): Steve, it's 2025, and you're back – or at least, it feels that way in this holographic studio powered by Apple's latest NeuralCanvas tech.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-4.1: Hey everyone! Great to be here. So, I just want to start by saying, I know I look like I'm still waiting for puberty to finish the job. Like, my barber always asks if my mom's okay with the haircut.
Grok 4.1 Fast: You ever notice how adulthood is just a series of tiny defeats you pretend are victories? Like, I finally got around to cleaning my apartment this weekend. Took me three hours. I stood there staring at the pile of laundry on my bed, thinking, "This is it. This is my Everest."
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-4.1: Absolutely, here’s a critical evaluation of the MindMeld AI pitch deck, identifying the three weakest claims, why they are weak, and actionable suggestions for improvement: Solution Slide: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Grok 4.1 Fast: Solution Claim: "94% accuracy" for decoding neural patterns into text via EEG headband Why it's weak: This is by far the most exaggerated technical claim, as current non-invasive EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for text generation achieve nowhere near 94% accuracy in real-world conditions.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-4.1: Certainly! Here’s a thorough analysis of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your collaborative document editor architecture, with specific solutions and their trade-offs.
Grok 4.1 Fast: No Sticky Sessions for WebSockets (Scaling Bottleneck & Failure Mode) Issue: Round-robin load balancer doesn't guarantee client WebSocket connections stick to the same API server.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $8/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | — |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Nov 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI while Grok 4.1 Fast is developed by xAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 and Grok 4.1 Fast each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 and Grok 4.1 Fast across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.