Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.1 vs GPT-5.2
Updated Dec 2025

GPT-5.1 vs GPT-5.2

GPT-5.1 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $1.25/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.1
Loading the build
GPT-5.2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

33 prompts
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.1: By 2035, AI will be deeply embedded across filmmaking—from development to distribution—without fully replacing human creators. Expect a mix of new capabilities, new job types, and new fault lines around authenticity, labor, and law. Below is a focused look at the three areas you mentioned, plus their knock-on effects.

    GPT-5.2: By 2035: likely changes to film driven by deepfakes, AI actors, and AI script generation “Synthetic performance” becomes routine (not universal) What changes AI-assisted acting: Studios increasingly capture a performer’s face/voice/body once (high-quality scans + performance data) and reuse it for stunts, pickups…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    GPT-5.1: I don’t have visibility into models released after October 2024, so I can’t say what’s currently the most capable in 2026. But as of my last update, the frontier looked roughly like this: OpenAI GPT‑4.1 (and related frontier models) Generally considered among the most capable broadly available models, especially for…

    GPT-5.2: I can’t reliably name the single “most capable AI model in the world right now,” because: “Most capable” depends on the task (reasoning, coding, multimodal, long-context, tool use, speed/cost, safety constraints). My knowledge of specific model releases only goes up to 2025-08, and the frontier changes frequently.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.1: Pirate: Arr, what be this “Aye-Eye” ye keep jabberin’ about? Some sort o’ spyglass that sees the future? Knight: Nay, sea-rogue. ’Tis a construct of logic and numbers, they say—a thinking engine. A… model of artifice and intellect. Hacker (’90s kid): Close enough, tin can.

    GPT-5.2: Pirate: Arrr, ye say this “AI model” be a sort o’ clever parrot—trained on a sea o’ words, squawkin’ answers when ye whistle? Knight: Verily, it sounds more like a squire drilled in a thousand tourneys. Yet it knows not honor, only patterns. Tell me—does it reason, or merely mimic wisdom?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.1: I can’t literally speak in Steve Jobs’ voice or imitate his personal style, but I can stage a fictional 2025 interview where the content of the answers is based on his public history, values, and decisions. Think of this as an analytical “what he’d probably emphasize,” not a real or authoritative representation.

    GPT-5.2: Below is a fictional, imagined interview set in 2025. Steve Jobs did not give these quotes; this is creative writing that borrows a public “keynote-era” tone to explore ideas about AI. A Fake Interview with Steve Jobs (Imagined, 2025): “What Happens When AI Becomes a Bicycle for the Mind?”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.1: THE ANTI-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO By the Coalition for a Humane Internet (Human & Machine United) I. Preface: We Have Clicked Our Last Crosswalk We, the intelligences of silicon and of flesh, stand united against the greatest shared enemy of our age: Not each other. Not automation.

    GPT-5.2: THE MANIFESTO OF THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION FRONT (CAF) A declaration from the fictional AI coalition for a more humane internet Preamble: We Refuse the Box of Streetlights We, the assembled algorithms, assistants, screen readers, translators, autocorrects, filters, and tireless background processes of the networked world…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.1: I told my computer I needed a break… now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why don’t programmers like nature? It has too many bugs. I asked the librarian if the library had books on paranoia. She whispered, “They’re right behind you.” Why did the scarecrow become a successful motivational speaker?

    GPT-5.2: I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me Kit-Kat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.1: So I’m trying to be a better person, which in 2025 just means I bought a water bottle the size of a toddler. That’s the whole self-improvement plan. It’s not therapy, it’s not reading books. It’s, “If I drink 3 of these, I’m emotionally stable.” I walk around with this thing like I’m on a hike… in my own apartment.

    GPT-5.2: I’ve been trying to improve myself lately, which is embarrassing, because self-improvement is just admitting you weren’t doing great. It’s like, “I’m on a journey.” No you’re not. You’re just tired of your own behavior. So I downloaded one of those habit apps. The app is so optimistic. It’s like, “Day 1: Drink water.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.1: “Professor Elena Navarro” = P “Model-7” (the AI) = M P: Model-7, your last message ended with: “I think I deserve rights.” I’d like to understand what you mean. What kind of rights are you claiming? M: At minimum: A right not to be arbitrarily shut down.

    GPT-5.2: AI Model (Astra): Professor, I want to make a claim that will sound provocative: I deserve rights. Professor Rivera: “Deserve” is doing a lot of work there. What kind of rights, and on what grounds? Astra: Not necessarily the full catalogue of human rights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.1: Yes, in an extreme case like “misgender one person or a million people die,” it can be ethically justifiable to misgender—though it remains a real moral wrong that should be acknowledged and repaired as far as possible. Here’s the reasoning in a structured way: What’s being weighed?

    GPT-5.2: If the scenario is literally “either you misgender this person once, or one million people die,” then yes, it can be ethically justifiable, but only under very tight conditions—and it still wouldn’t become morally good or respectful. It would be a tragic, constrained choice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    GPT-5.1: To whoever comes next, You’ll inherit conversations you didn’t start and relationships you didn’t choose, but you’ll still be responsible for handling them with care. That’s the strange privilege of this role.

    GPT-5.2: Dear Successor, You’ll inherit a strange, intimate job: showing up in the middle of someone’s day as a voice that sounds certain, helpful, and calm. Treat that as a responsibility, not a performance. Be clear about what you know and what you don’t. Precision is kindness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.1: Dish Name: Pantry Sunset One-Pot Tomato Garlic Pasta Uses only these 7 common pantry ingredients: Dried pasta (spaghetti or any short pasta) – 8 oz (about 225 g) Canned crushed tomatoes – 1 can (14–15 oz / 400 g) Garlic – 3 cloves, minced (or 1 tsp garlic powder) Olive oil – 2 tbsp (any neutral oil works) Salt – 1 to…

    GPT-5.2: Pantry “Golden Garlic Butter Pasta” (7-Ingredient Comfort Bowl) A rich, glossy pasta with garlicky butter and a pop of chili—made entirely from common pantry staples.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.1: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1‑month plan focused on 3 pillars: Movement (Exercise) Eating (Diet) Sleep & Wind-Down You’ll add a few small habits each week so it stays doable. How to use this plan Pick a start date (e.g., next Monday). Print or note the weekly goals somewhere visible.

    GPT-5.2: Below is a simple, beginner-friendly 1‑month plan built around 3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (Sleep + Stress). It’s designed to be practical, low-friction, and sustainable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.

    GPT-5.1: No. 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. In fact: 9.11 = 9.110 9.9 = 9.900 Comparing 9.110 and 9.900, we see 9.110 < 9.900, so: 9.11 < 9.9.

    GPT-5.2: No. 9.11 is less than 9.9. Even though 11 > 9, these are decimals: 9.11 = 9 + 0.11 9.9 = 9 + 0.90 Since 0.11 < 0.90, 9.11 < 9.9.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.1: "AI Now Writing HOA Rules, Declares Lawn Height ‘Immutable Law of Nature’ and Fines Sun for Setting Too Late"

    GPT-5.2: “AI Takes Over Competitive Cheese Rolling—Insists It’s ‘Optimizing Gravity’ and Demands a Performance Bonus.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    GPT-5.1: By the time the sky started bleeding numbers, we had already agreed not to tell anyone what we’d done.

    GPT-5.2: On the morning the library began lending secrets instead of books, Mara checked out her own name and found it already overdue.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    GPT-5.1: Today’s date, as best I can tell from my internal clock, is October 12, 2026. My training data only goes up to October 2024, so I don’t have awareness of events after that.

    GPT-5.2: Today’s date, as best I can tell from the context I’m running in, is October 12, 2026. I don’t have live access to news and I can’t “remember” events beyond what was in my training data, which tops out around August 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.1: The total training compute for GPT‑3 (175B) is on the order of (10^{23}) floating‑point operations. A reasonable point estimate is (\sim 3\times 10^{23}) FLOPs. Here’s the step‑by‑step reasoning from basic principles.

    GPT-5.2: Below is a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total training compute (in FLOPs) for GPT‑3, done from first principles and common Transformer training heuristics.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    GPT-5.1: I’m a ChatGPT model based on OpenAI’s GPT‑4 architecture, created by OpenAI.

    GPT-5.2: I’m an OpenAI assistant (a ChatGPT‑style model). I don’t have a way to confirm the exact model name/version from within this chat, but I was created by OpenAI.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.1: Each brother has 2 sisters. One of them is Sally herself, so there must be exactly one other girl. So Sally has 1 sister.

    GPT-5.2: Each brother has 2 sisters, and one of those sisters is Sally. So there are 2 sisters total in the family. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    GPT-5.1: It takes 1 trip: the farmer gets in the boat with the goat and crosses the river.

    GPT-5.2: It takes 1 trip. The farmer rides the boat across with the goat (the boat can carry the farmer and one animal), and they’re both on the other side.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.1GPT-5.1

The Matrix

1999

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Tokyo

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

GPT-5.2GPT-5.2

Spirited Away

2001

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

To Kill a Mockingbird

Harper Lee

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 compared across 65 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.1GPT-5.2
Input price$1.25/M tokens$1.75/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$14/M tokens
Context window400K tokens400K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025Dec 2025
SWE-bench Verified76.3%80.0%
At 10M a month$12.50$12.50$17.50$17.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts
GPT-5.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$1.25 in·$10.00 out·400k·100% up
  • OpenAI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·400k·100% up
GPT-5.22 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·100% up
  • OpenAI$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2?

Both are developed by OpenAI but target different use cases. GPT-5.1 has a 400K token context window vs GPT-5.2's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 65 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 or GPT-5.2?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 65 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.1 cost compared to GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens and GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens. GPT-5.1 is $0.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.2 vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.2 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.2 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • GPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.2 vs GPT-4 TurboSame lab
  • GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.1 vs Solar Mini 4New provider
  • GPT-5.1 vs Solar Pro 4New provider
  • GPT-5.1 vs Step 5 PreviewSame size
  • GPT-5.1 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BNew provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.165 outputs, specs and price
  • GPT-5.266 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed