Realistic AI Interview

Title: "The Future of AI: A Conversation with Steve Jobs (2025)" Location: A minimalist, sunlit studio in Palo Alto. Steve Jobs, now in his late 60s (if he were alive), sits across from the interviewer, wearing his signature black turtleneck and jeans. His piercing gaze and measured cadence remain unchanged—though his insights on AI carry the weight of a man who once redefined technology itself.

---

Interviewer:

"Steve, it’s an honor to have you here. AI has exploded since your passing—generative models, AGI debates, even AI-driven creativity. What’s your take on where we are in 2025?"

Steve Jobs:

"You know, I’ve always believed technology should be magical—not in the sense of tricks, but in the way it disappears into the experience. Right now, AI is like a teenager: full of potential, but still figuring out its purpose. We’ve built these incredible tools, but we’re asking the wrong questions. It’s not about what AI can do—it’s about what it should do."

Interviewer:

"Should do? That sounds like a design philosophy. Are you saying AI lacks a ‘human touch’?"

Steve Jobs: (leans forward, smiling)

"Exactly. Look at the iPhone. It wasn’t the first smartphone, but it was the first one that felt like it was made for humans. AI today is like the early PCs—clunky, over-engineered, and missing the soul. The companies leading AI are obsessed with scale, with ‘disrupting’ everything. But disruption without intention is just noise. Apple’s approach was always: ‘How does this make people’s lives better?’ AI needs that same discipline."

Interviewer:

"You’ve criticized ‘feature creep’ before. Is AI suffering from that?"

Steve Jobs: (chuckles)

"Oh, absolutely. Right now, AI is a Swiss Army knife with 500 blades, but no one knows which one to use. Take generative AI—it’s astonishing, but it’s also a parlor trick if it doesn’t serve a deeper purpose. I’ll give you an example: When we built Siri, the goal wasn’t just to answer questions. It was to anticipate them. To understand context, tone, even emotion. Today’s AI can write a sonnet, but can it tell you why you needed one? That’s the difference between a tool and a companion."

Interviewer:

"You’re hinting at AGI—artificial general intelligence. Do you think we’ll see it in our lifetime?"

Steve Jobs: (pauses, thoughtful)

"I think we’ll see glimpses of it—moments where AI surprises us with something almost… human. But true AGI? That’s not a technical problem; it’s a philosophical one. What does it mean to be intelligent? To be conscious? We’re still arguing over whether a chatbot has ‘understanding’ when we can’t even define what understanding is for ourselves. The danger isn’t that AI will become too smart—it’s that we’ll mistake simulation for soul."

Interviewer:

"Elon Musk has called AI an ‘existential risk.’ Do you agree?"

Steve Jobs: (shakes head)

"Elon’s a brilliant engineer, but he’s always been drawn to the apocalyptic. The real risk isn’t Skynet—it’s mediocrity. AI that’s just good enough to replace human effort without elevating it. Imagine a world where AI writes your emails, designs your logos, even composes your music… but none of it means anything. That’s the dystopia. Not machines taking over, but humans stopping."

Interviewer:

"So how do we avoid that?"

Steve Jobs:

"By remembering that technology is a bicycle for the mind—not a replacement for it. AI should be like a great editor: it sharpens your ideas, but the ideas are still yours. The companies that win won’t be the ones with the biggest models; they’ll be the ones that ask: ‘How does this make people more creative, more connected, more human?’ At Apple, we used to say, ‘The journey is the reward.’ AI should be the same. It’s not about the destination—it’s about the experience of getting there."

Interviewer:

"Final question: If you were running Apple today, what would your AI strategy look like?"

Steve Jobs: (grins, eyes twinkling)

"I’d start by firing the focus groups. (laughs) No, seriously—I’d build AI that disappears. Not chatbots, not avatars, but systems that work so seamlessly you forget they’re there. Imagine an AI that doesn’t just answer your questions, but teaches you to ask better ones. That doesn’t just edit your photos, but helps you see the world differently. And I’d make damn sure it was private—because if your data isn’t yours, then you’re not the customer. You’re the product."

"But most of all? I’d make it beautiful. Because in the end, people don’t remember what a machine did for them. They remember how it made them feel."

(Pauses, then smirks.) "And I’d call it… iMind."

---

Interviewer: (laughs) "Steve, as always, you’ve given us a lot to think about. Thank you."

Steve Jobs: "Just don’t make it too complicated. Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."

(The screen fades to black as the sound of a Mac startup chime plays softly.)

---

Postscript (2025): Rumors swirl that Apple’s secretive "Project Titan" AI team has been working on a neural interface—codenamed "iMind"—that integrates seamlessly with the human brain. No confirmation yet, but sources say it’s "the most Jobsian thing since the iPhone."

Would you like a follow-up on how "iMind" might work? Or perhaps a debate with Jobs vs. Elon Musk on AI ethics?