Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Gemini Pro 1.0
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Gemini Pro 1.0 compares on this challenge:

  • Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Gemini Pro 1.0

Estimate Complexity

Gemini Pro 1.0's response to the challenge: Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Gemini Pro 1.0
April 20, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Gemini Pro 1.0
Response

gemini-pro logo
Gemini Pro 1.0Estimate Complexity
gemini-pro logo
Gemini Pro 1.0

Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs: A Step-by-Step Approach

Without access to online resources, we can estimate the FLOPs (Floating-point Operations) needed for GPT-3 training by considering the following factors:

1. Model Size:

  • GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters.
  • Each parameter update involves two multiplications and one addition for each floating-point number.
  • Therefore, each parameter update requires 3 FLOPs.
  • Total FLOPs per update: 175 billion parameters * 3 FLOPs/parameter = 525 billion FLOPs.

2. Training Data Size:

  • GPT-3 was trained on a massive dataset of text and code.
  • Let's assume the dataset size is 500 billion words.
  • Each word is represented by an embedding vector of size 1,024.
  • Therefore, the total number of floating-point numbers in the dataset is 500 billion words * 1,024 = 512 trillion.

3. Number of Training Steps:

  • The exact number of training steps is unknown, but it likely involves millions of iterations over the entire dataset.
  • Let's assume there are 10 million training steps.

4. Optimization Algorithm:

  • GPT-3 likely uses Adam optimizer, which involves additional computations for updating parameters.
  • The exact FLOPs associated with the optimizer are difficult to estimate without knowing the specific hyperparameters used.
  • For simplicity, we can assume an additional 10 FLOPs per parameter update.

5. Hardware Efficiency:

  • Modern hardware like GPUs and TPUs can perform several FLOPs per clock cycle.
  • Let's assume an average efficiency of 5 FLOPs per clock cycle.

Putting it all together:

  • Total FLOPs per update: 525 billion (parameter updates) + 10 billion (optimizer) = 535 billion FLOPs
  • Total FLOPs for training: 535 billion FLOPs/update * 10 million updates = 5.35 * 10^18 FLOPs
  • Adjusted for hardware efficiency: 5.35 * 10^18 FLOPs / 5 FLOPs/cycle = 1.07 * 10^18 clock cycles

Therefore, the estimated total FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online is approximately 1.07 * 10^18 clock cycles.

Important Caveats:

  • This is a rough estimate and may not be accurate due to several unknown factors, including the exact training data size, number of training steps, optimizer settings, and hardware efficiency.
  • The actual FLOPs could be significantly higher or lower depending on the specific training details.

Additionally, it's important to remember that this is just an estimation of the computational cost. Training a model like GPT-3 also requires significant energy consumption and environmental impact.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Gemini Pro 1.0

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode Generation

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Google
Released
2023-12-13
Size
LARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
32,760 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival