Realistic AI Interview

---

The Interview

Setting: A spartan, sunlit office in Cupertino. Minimalist furniture, a large window overlooking a lush campus. The year is 2025. STEVE JOBS, looking remarkably unchanged, sits in a leather chair. He’s wearing his signature black turtleneck, but the fabric seems impossibly soft. He leans forward, elbows on his knees, his intensity palpable. Opposite him sits a journalist from a leading tech publication, ALEX REID.

Alex Reid: Steve, thank you for your time. It’s… an unexpected pleasure.

Steve Jobs: (Waves a hand dismissively) Time is the one thing we can’t buy more of, so let’s not waste it. What do you want to know?

Alex: Right. Let's jump in. It’s 2025. The world is obsessed with AI. We have generative models creating art and code, large language models acting as assistants, an arms race between giants for AGI. From your vantage point, what do you make of it all?

Steve: (A small, almost weary smile) Look… what you’re describing isn’t a revolution. It’s a feature race. It’s like watching PC makers in the 90s arguing over who has the most megahertz. It’s noise. They’re building incredibly powerful engines, but they have no idea what kind of car to put them in. They’re giving people a faster horse when what’s needed is an entirely new form of transportation.

Alex: That’s a strong statement. Companies are valuing these AI ventures in the trillions. You’re saying they’re missing the point?

Steve: Completely. They’re focused on the what, not the why. Why does this exist? To answer your emails faster? To write a mediocre marketing slogan? That’s not a tool for the mind. That’s a crutch for the lazy. The current AI is a mirror. It reflects all the data we’ve fed it—the good, the bad, the mediocre. It has no soul. It has no taste. And technology without taste is just… junk.

Alex: So what is the why? What should AI be?

Steve: It should be a bicycle for the mind. I said that a long time ago, and it’s more true now than ever. But a bicycle is something you control. It amplifies your own effort. The AI being built today is a scooter you rent. It takes you somewhere, but you’re not in control. You’re just a passenger.

Real AI isn’t a chatbot you have a conversation with. It’s not a separate app you open. It should be invisible. It should be woven into the very fabric of the tools we use to create and think and connect. It shouldn't just answer your questions; it should anticipate your intent. It should be an intuitive partner.

Alex: An "intuitive partner." That sounds like a new product. Is that what you’re working on?

Steve: (Leans back, eyes gleaming) We don’t think in terms of "products." We think in terms of experiences. Imagine a musician who’s struggling with a chord progression. Their AI partner doesn’t just suggest a pre-existing chord. It understands the feeling they’re trying to evoke—the melancholy, the hope—and it offers three new, never-before-heard options that perfectly match their emotional intent. It doesn’t replace their creativity; it unlocks it.

Imagine a designer sketching on a tablet. As their pen moves, the AI understands the underlying physics of the object they're drawing, the material properties, the light source. It subtly corrects the perspective, suggests a more elegant curve. It’s not doing the work; it’s removing the friction between the idea in their head and the expression on the page.

Alex: That requires immense power. The current trend is towards massive, centralized data centers. You’re talking about something different.

Steve: Of course I am. The cloud is a mainframe. It’s dumb. It’s a utility, like electricity. You don’t build your life around the power plant. The most personal, most intimate experiences happen locally. On a device that is an extension of you. The revolution isn't in bigger data centers; it's in insanely powerful, hyper-efficient silicon that can run these models so fast you don’t even know they're there. Hardware and software. Woven together. It’s the only way to build something with soul. You can’t have soul when you’re 500 milliseconds away from a server in Oregon.

Alex: So the future isn’t about a bigger, smarter chatbot. It’s about this invisible, embedded…

Steve: …Amplifier. Yes. It amplifies your taste, your intuition, your humanity. The others are building things that make you feel… replaceable. We’re building things that make you feel invincible. There’s a profound difference.

Alex: Let’s talk about the fears. The fear of AGI, of job displacement, of a world where human effort is devalued.

Steve: (Scoffs lightly) Fear is a sign of a lack of imagination. They always feared the loom. They feared the assembly line. They feared the personal computer. And you know what? Some jobs went away. But far, far more were created. Jobs that required more creativity, more humanity, more… thought.

When the tractor was invented, we didn’t have a nation of unemployed farmers. We had fewer farmers, and a boom in everything else. AI will be the same. It will automate the drudgery. The mundane. The repetitive. And it will do it so well that we’ll be free to focus on what makes us human. To ask better questions. To create art. To connect with each other. Anyone who thinks their value is in their ability to perform a repetitive task… well, they were already on borrowed time. AI is just the catalyst.

Alex: And AGI? True artificial general intelligence?

Steve: It’s a ghost story for computer scientists. It’s a distraction. We’re not building a new form of life to worship or fear. We’re building a tool. A chisel. The goal isn’t to make the chisel think like a sculptor. The goal is to make the best damn chisel in the world, so the sculptor can create something they never could have before. The focus should be on empowering the artist, not on creating the art.

Alex: So what’s the endgame? What is the ultimate expression of this philosophy?

Steve: (He stands up and walks to the large window, looking out over the campus.) The endgame isn’t a device. It’s not software. It’s a new renaissance. A flowering of human creativity on a scale we can’t even imagine. When you give a billion people the perfect tool to amplify their unique genius, you don’t get incremental change. You get an explosion. We’re on the cusp of the most creative period in human history. And the people who are just building faster chatbots are going to miss it entirely. They’re selling shovels in a gold rush, while we’re trying to build the entire city.

(He turns back, a look of fierce conviction on his face.)

Steve: It's always been about putting a ding in the universe. This is just a bigger hammer.

(He gives a curt nod. The interview is over.)