Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. GPT-4.1 Mini
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how GPT-4.1 Mini compares on this challenge:

  • GPT-4.1 Mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • GPT-4.1 Mini vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • GPT-4.1 Mini vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to GPT-4.1 Mini

Estimate Complexity

GPT-4.1 Mini's response to the Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

GPT-4.1 Mini
April 14, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4.1 Mini
Response

gpt-4.1-mini logo
GPT-4.1 MiniEstimate Complexity
gpt-4.1-mini logo
GPT-4.1 Mini

Certainly! Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 by breaking down the problem step-by-step. We won't rely on online data but will reason from first principles and known architectural characteristics.


Step 1: Understand GPT-3's basic specifications

GPT-3, the largest model version, has approximately:

  • Number of parameters (weights): 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹)
  • Number of layers: about 96 transformer layers
  • Model size: 175B parameters is widely known

Step 2: Estimate FLOPs per forward pass per token

A transformer forward pass consists mainly of:

  • Matrix multiplications in self-attention
  • Matrix multiplications in feedforward network (FFN)

Two main components dominate FLOPs:

  1. Self-attention: roughly proportional to ( d_{model}^2 ) per token (where ( d_{model} ) is hidden size)
  2. Feedforward layer: 2 linear layers per transformer layer, roughly (4 d_{model}^2) multiplications per token (due to expanding dimension by factor 4 in FFN)

Step 3: Extract hidden size and sequence length

From papers and common configurations:

  • Hidden size ( d_{model} approx 12,288 ) (for 175B model)
  • Sequence length used during training ( L approx 2048 ) tokens (max context length)

Step 4: Calculate approximate FLOPs per token per forward pass

Using formulas from transformer FLOPs estimation:

  • For each transformer layer, per token, forward pass FLOPs roughly:

[ ext{FLOPs}_ ext{layer/token} approx 2 imes d_{model}^2 ]

(for attention and FFN combined, includes multiplications and additions)

Because the FFN (feedforward network) is the heaviest part, it dominates, so let's assume:

  • ( sim 8 imes d_{model}^2 ) FLOPs per token per layer (this is a common estimate for one forward pass)

Substituting:

[ 8 imes (12,288)^2 approx 8 imes 1.5 imes 10^8 = 1.2 imes 10^9 ext{ FLOPs per token per layer} ]

For 96 layers:

[ 1.2 imes 10^9 imes 96 = 1.15 imes 10^{11} ext{ FLOPs per token (forward pass)} ]


Step 5: Account for backward pass

Backpropagation generally costs about 2× to 3× the forward pass FLOPs because computing gradients involves forward pass and backward pass computations.

Use factor 3 to be safe:

[ ext{FLOPs} = 3 imes 1.15 imes 10^{11} = 3.45 imes 10^{11} ext{ FLOPs per token (forward + backward)} ]


Step 6: Calculate total number of tokens used in training

From publicly known info, GPT-3 was trained on about 300 billion tokens (around 3 × 10¹¹ tokens) of text.


Step 7: Calculate total FLOPs for full training

Multiply FLOPs per token by total tokens:

[ 3.45 imes 10^{11} imes 3 imes 10^{11} = 1.035 imes 10^{23} ext{ FLOPs} ]


Final estimation:

[ oxed{ ext{Total FLOPs to train GPT-3} approx 10^{23} quad ext{FLOPs} } ]


Summary:

  • Per token forward + backward FLOPs: (sim 3.5 imes 10^{11})
  • Number of training tokens: (sim 3 imes 10^{11})
  • Total training FLOPs: (sim 10^{23})

Additional notes:

  • This estimate matches the order of magnitude widely discussed in ML circles.
  • Variations depend on exact training steps, optimizer, precision (FP16/32), etc.
  • Might be a bit lower or higher depending on exact implementation.

So, the training of GPT-3 requires on the order of ( 10^{23} ) floating point operations.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About GPT-4.1 Mini

Capabilities

ConversationAnalysisCode Generation

Categories

TextCodeImageMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Openai
Released
2025-04-14
Size
MEDIUM
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
1,047,576 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival