Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Grok 4.1 Fast
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Grok 4.1 Fast compares on this challenge:

  • Grok 4.1 Fast vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Grok 4.1 Fast vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Grok 4.1 Fast vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Grok 4.1 Fast

Estimate Complexity

Grok 4.1 Fast's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.

Grok 4.1 Fast
November 21, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Grok 4.1 Fast
Response

grok-4.1-fast logo
Grok 4.1 FastEstimate Complexity
grok-4.1-fast logo
Grok 4.1 Fast

Step-by-Step Reasoning for Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs

  1. Recall GPT-3 key specs from memory:

    • GPT-3 (davinci variant) has N = 175 billion parameters (1.75 × 10¹¹).
    • It was trained on approximately D = 300 billion tokens (3 × 10¹¹). This is the total number of byte-pair encoded (BPE) tokens processed during pre-training, as stated in the GPT-3 paper ("Language Models are Few-Shot Learners"). The dataset included filtered Common Crawl (~250B tokens), WebText2, Books1/Books2, and Wikipedia, totaling ~300B tokens for the largest model.
  2. Understand the standard FLOPs formula for transformer training:

    • For autoregressive transformers like GPT, the total training compute C ≈ 6 × N × D floating-point operations (FLOPs).
    • Why 6? This is an established approximation from OpenAI's scaling laws papers (e.g., Kaplan et al., 2020):
      PassFLOPs per tokenRationale
      Forward~2NTwo main matrix multiplications per layer (attention + FFN), summed over layers ≈ 2N ops/token.
      Backward~4NGradient computation is roughly 2× forward pass FLOPs.
      Total6NNeglects minor overheads like activations/softmax (~10-20% but often ignored for estimates).
    • This assumes dense training (no sparsity), BF16/FP16 precision, and standard optimizer (AdamW). It's accurate within ~10-20% for LMs like GPT.
  3. Plug in the numbers:

    C ≈ 6 × (1.75 × 10¹¹) × (3 × 10¹¹)
      = 6 × 1.75 × 3 × 10^(11+11)
      = 6 × 5.25 × 10²²
      = 31.5 × 10²²
      = 3.15 × 10²³ FLOPs
    
    • In scientific notation: ~3.1 × 10²³ FLOPs (rounded for estimation; exact calc is 3.15 × 10²³).
  4. Validation and caveats:

    • This matches widely cited figures (e.g., ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs) from OpenAI reports and papers like Hoffmann et al. (Chinchilla, 2022), which retroactively analyzed GPT-3.
    • Uncertainties (±20%): Exact D might be 300-410B tokens (some sources say 410B BPE); activations/optimizer overhead; mixture-of-experts (none in GPT-3); hardware efficiency losses.
    • Not included: Preprocessing, fine-tuning, or inference FLOPs—just core pre-training.

Final estimate: ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs (or 300 sextillion FLOPs). This was feasible on ~10,000 V100/A100 GPUs over months, costing ~$4-12M in cloud compute.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Grok 4.1 Fast

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Xai
Released
2025-11-21
Size
XLARGE

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival