Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Kimi K2
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Kimi K2 compares on this challenge:

  • Kimi K2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Kimi K2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Kimi K2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Kimi K2

Estimate Complexity

Kimi K2's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.

Kimi K2
July 12, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K2
Response

kimi-k2 logo
Kimi K2Estimate Complexity
kimi-k2 logo
Kimi K2

Here is one way to “Fermi-estimate” the training compute for GPT-3 without looking up any numbers. I will start from generally known facts (model size, data size, hardware specs) and work forward.

Step 1 – Fix the model parameters
A widely reported figure is that GPT-3 has 175 B parameters.
N ≈ 1.75 × 10¹¹.

Step 2 – Fix the training-token budget
OpenAI papers mention ~300 B tokens.
T ≈ 3 × 10¹¹.

Step 3 – Recall the per-token FLOP rule for dense transformers
Every time one token is processed, the forward pass does roughly
2 FLOPs/parameter (multiply-accumulate counts as 2).
The backward pass does about twice the work of the forward pass, so
total ≈ 3× forward FLOPs.
Thus the “textbook” estimate is
6 FLOPs · N · T.

Step 4 – Plug the numbers in
FLOPs = 6 · (1.75 × 10¹¹) · (3 × 10¹¹)
= 6 · 5.25 × 10²²
≈ 3.15 × 10²³ FLOPs.

Step 5 – Add a safety factor for real-world overheads
Large-scale jobs typically run at 30-50 % of theoretical peak because of communication, stragglers, recomputation for activation checkpointing, etc.
A factor of 2 covers this nicely.
3.15 × 10²³ × 2 ≈ 6 × 10²³ FLOPs.

Final estimate
Training GPT-3 required on the order of 3–6 × 10²³ floating-point operations.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Kimi K2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Moonshotai
Released
2025-07-11
Size
XLARGE

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Kimi K2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival