Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compares on this challenge:

  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Estimate Complexity

Nemotron Nano 9B V2's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
September 12, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Response

nemotron-nano-9b-v2 logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2Estimate Complexity
nemotron-nano-9b-v2 logo
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3 involves breaking down the computational complexity of the model and its training process. Here's a step-by-step reasoning:


1. Understand the Model Architecture

GPT-3 is a transformer-based model with 175 billion parameters. Transformers rely heavily on matrix multiplications, which are computationally intensive. Key components include:

  • Self-attention mechanisms: Involve multiple matrix multiplications (e.g., query-key, key-value, and value projections).
  • Feed-forward networks: Two linear layers per transformer block.
  • Multiple layers: GPT-3 has 48 transformer layers.

2. Estimate FLOPs per Token

Each token processed by the model requires a significant number of FLOPs. For a transformer layer:

  • Self-attention: For a hidden size $ d $ (e.g., 12,000 for GPT-3), each attention head involves matrix multiplications. With 96 attention heads, the FLOPs per token per layer can be approximated as: $$ \text{FLOPs per token per layer} \approx 200 \times d^2 $$ (This accounts for attention and feed-forward operations.)
  • Total layers: 48 layers, so: $$ \text{FLOPs per token} \approx 48 \times 200 \times d^2 $$ Substituting $ d = 12,000 $: $$ 48 \times 200 \times (12,000)^2 = 1.38 \times 10^{12} \text{ FLOPs per token}. $$

3. Total Tokens in Training Data

GPT-3 was trained on 300 billion tokens (3e11). This is a rough estimate based on public information about the dataset size.


4. Total FLOPs Calculation

Multiply the FLOPs per token by the total number of tokens: $$ \text{Total FLOPs} = 1.38 \times 10^{12} \times 3 \times 10^{11} = 4.14 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}. $$


5. Consider Training Steps and Epochs

  • Training involves multiple epochs (full passes over the dataset). If GPT-3 was trained for 100 epochs, the total FLOPs would be: $$ 4.14 \times 10^{23} \times 100 = 4.14 \times 10^{25} \text{ FLOPs}. $$
  • However, this assumes each token is processed once per epoch. In practice, the number of steps (batches) and optimization details (e.g., Adam optimizer) might adjust this, but the order of magnitude remains $ 10^{23} $ to $ 10^{25} $.

Final Estimate

The total FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is approximately $ 10^{23} $ to $ 10^{25} $. This aligns with known estimates from research and industry reports, which suggest GPT-3 required around $ 10^{23} $ FLOPs for training.


Key Assumptions

  • Parameters: 175 billion.
  • Hidden size: ~12,000.
  • Attention heads: 96.
  • Training data: 300 billion tokens.
  • Operations per token: ~1.38e12 FLOPs (based on transformer complexity).
  • Epochs: 100 (adjustable based on training duration).

This estimation highlights the immense computational scale of training large language models like GPT-3.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Nvidia
Released
2025-09-05
Size
MEDIUM
Context
131,072 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival