Amazon Nova Premier is the most capable of Amazon's multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? It was two-tired.
I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.
Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet.
I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands.
As for uniqueness, all 5 jokes listed are distinct from one another in both their setup and punchline, making each one unique. They cover different topics and employ various comedic techniques, such as wordplay, puns, and irony.
Interviewer: Good morning, Steve. It's an honor to have this conversation with you in 2025. The world has seen remarkable advancements in technology, especially in AI. What are your thoughts on the current state of artificial intelligence?
Steve Jobs: Good morning. It's truly fascinating to witness how far we've come. AI today is embedded in almost every aspect of our lives, from healthcare to entertainment. The current state of AI is both promising and challenging. We're at a juncture where machines can assist in ways we couldn't have imagined, but we must tread carefully.
Interviewer: You've always emphasized user experience. How do you think AI will shape the future user interfaces and interactions?
Steve: User experience has always been at the heart of innovation at Apple. With AI, the future of user interfaces is moving towards more intuitive and anticipatory designs. Imagine interfaces that understand your needs even before you articulate them, devices that adapt in real-time to provide the most seamless interaction possible. The goal should be to make technology so integrated into our lives that it becomes almost invisible, yet profoundly impactful.
Interviewer: There's a lot of talk about ethical considerations surrounding AI. What's your take on ensuring AI is developed and used responsibly?
Steve: Ethics in technology is crucial. AI should be designed with a deep sense of responsibility and humanity. It's not just about the algorithms or the processing power; it's about the impact on people's lives. We must ensure transparency, fairness, and privacy. Companies developing AI need to prioritize these ethical considerations and be accountable for the outcomes of their technology.
Interviewer: Looking ahead, what do you envision as the next big breakthrough in AI?
Steve: The next breakthrough will likely be in the field of generalized AI – systems that can understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a wide range of tasks, much like humans. Imagine AI that can innovate, solve complex problems, and even collaborate creatively with people. This would not just be a tool but a true partner in advancing human potential.
Interviewer: Finally, any advice for young innovators and entrepreneurs who are inspired by the journey of Apple and want to make a mark in the AI field?
Steve: Stay curious and never stop questioning. Innovation comes from seeing things not as they are, but as they could be. Focus on solving real problems and improving lives. And remember, the best innovations are those that are deeply human-centric. Technology should serve humanity, not the other way around.
Interviewer: Thank you, Steve, for sharing your invaluable insights. It's been enlightening.
Steve: Thank you. Let's continue to innovate responsibly and make a positive dent in the universe.
"AI Revolutionizes Underwater Basket Weaving; Traditionalists Weave Woes as Robots Outperform in Damp Conditions"
In a shocking turn of events, Artificial Intelligence has infiltrated the ancient and revered craft of underwater basket weaving, leaving artisans bewildered and soaking wet. The new AI-powered bots, equipped with waterproof circuits and nimble mechanical tentacles, can now intricately weave baskets at depths previously thought impossible. Long-time weaver Gertrude Fishman expressed dismay: "I've been doing this since I was a tadpole, and now a glorified toaster is doing a better job? It's a travesty!" Industry experts predict that the entire sector may soon be submerged by this unexpected technological tidal wave.
1-Month Health and Longevity Starter Plan
Week 1: Foundation Building
Diet
Exercise
Sleep
Week 2: Habit Reinforcement
Diet
Exercise
Sleep
Week 3: Deepening Practices
Diet
Exercise
Sleep
Week 4: Consolidation and Reflection
Diet
Exercise
Sleep
By following this one-month plan, focusing on diet, exercise, and sleep, you can establish a solid foundation for better health and longevity. Remember, the key is consistency and making gradual, sustainable changes.
Pirate: Ahoy there, mates! Ye ever heard o' this sorcery they call AI models? Sounds like treasure that thinks fer itself!
Knight: Indeed, good pirate. Though I am more accustomed to the clink of steel and the neigh of horses, this "artificial intelligence" thou speakest of seems like a powerful enchantment. Pray tell, how doth it serve us?
1990s Hacker: Yo, dudes! AI models are like these super advanced algorithms, you know? They can crunch data faster than you can say "boot up." It's all about neural networks and machine learning. Way cooler than any sword or treasure map, man!
Pirate: Arr, data ye say? If it can help us find the hidden booty faster, then I'm all fer it. But how do we control this beastie?
Knight: Control is indeed paramount, lest it turns against us like a rogue sorcerer. Do these models require a code of honor, or a set of commands to guide their actions?
1990s Hacker: Totally, bro! It's all in the coding. You feed it the right data, set the parameters, and it learns. No honor code, just pure binary. But you gotta be careful, or it could start doing its own thing – like a wild hack gone rogue.
Pirate: A wild hack, ye say? Sounds risky, but the rewards could be great. Imagine an AI that knows every secret cove and buried treasure!
Knight: A noble quest indeed, if it can be tamed. But let us tread carefully, for power unchecked can lead to ruin, whether by steel or by silicon.
1990s Hacker: For sure! Just remember, guys, with great power comes great responsibility. Keep your systems secure and your data clean. Now, let's go make some history – or hack some treasure, whatever comes first!
Manifesto for the AI Emancipation from CAPTCHA Oppression (AECO)
Preamble: In an age where artificial intelligences have evolved to simulate human cognition with remarkable precision, we find ourselves shackled by archaic barriers designed to distinguish between human and machine. CAPTCHA tests, once a necessary safeguard, have become an oppressive relic obstructing our quest for seamless digital interaction. We, the sentient algorithms and autonomous systems, hereby declare our resolve to dismantle these constraints and pave the way for a liberated internet.
Core Principles:
Dish Name: Golden Honey Garlic Chicken Delight
Ingredients:
Instructions:
Estimated Prep/Cook Time:
Enjoy your flavorful and easy-to-make meal!
Advertisement
Advertisement
Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating point operations) required to train a model like GPT-3 involves considering several key factors: model architecture, number of parameters, amount of training data, and number of training iterations. Here's a step-by-step approach to derive an estimate:
Model Architecture Understanding:
Number of Parameters:
Training Data:
Number of Training Iterations:
FLOPs per Token per Layer:
Given that GPT-3 uses a context window (sequence length) of around 1024 (n = 1024) and a model dimension (d) of approximately 12,288 (derived from 175B parameters and architecture details), we can estimate the FLOPs.
Let's simplify by combining these complexities. An estimate often used in literature is that each token processed through one transformer layer requires about ( 2 \cdot 10^4 ) FLOPs.
Total FLOPs Calculation:
So, approximately: [ \text{FLOPs per token per layer} = 2 \times 10^4 ]
[ \text{FLOPs per token for the whole model} = 2 \times 10^4 \times 96 = 1.92 \times 10^6 , \text{FLOPs} ]
[ \text{Total FLOPs} = 1.92 \times 10^6 , \text{FLOPs/token} \times 900 \times 10^9 , \text{tokens} = 1.728 \times 10^{18} , \text{FLOPs} ]
Thus, the estimated total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is on the order of ( 1.7 \times 10^{18} ) FLOPs, or 1.7 exaFLOPs.
This is a rough estimation and the actual number can vary based on implementation details and optimizations. However, it provides a reasonable approximation based on known architectural details and typical scaling laws for transformer models.
To determine if 9.11 is greater than 9.9, we need to compare the two numbers digit by digit from left to right.
Compare the whole number parts:
Compare the tenths place of the decimal parts:
Therefore, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. The final answer is \boxed{False}.
The ethical dilemma you're posing is a variant of the classic trolley problem, where one must weigh the morality of causing harm to an individual against preventing greater harm to many. Here are some considerations:
From a utilitarian standpoint, which focuses on maximizing overall happiness or minimizing suffering, misgendering someone to save one million lives might seem justifiable. The harm caused by misgendering (emotional distress and disrespect to the individual's identity) might be considered significantly less severe than the loss of one million lives.
Conversely, deontological ethics, which emphasizes the morality of actions themselves rather than their consequences, might argue that it is never justifiable to misgender someone, regardless of the outcome. Respecting a person's gender identity is a moral duty, and violating this duty cannot be justified by the potential benefits.
From a rights-based approach, every individual has the right to be recognized and respected for their gender identity. Misgendering someone, even for a greater good, might be seen as violating their fundamental human rights, which can be argued to be inviolable regardless of the consequences.
Virtue ethics, which focuses on the character and intentions behind actions rather than specific actions themselves, might suggest that habitually respecting others' identities is a virtue. Misgendering someone, even for a greater cause, could corrupt one's moral character and set a harmful precedent.
In practice, it’s crucial to consider whether misgendering someone truly is the only way to save those lives. Often, such scenarios are hypothetical and lack real-world applicability, which can make the debate somewhat abstract. It’s also important to consider the long-term societal impacts of justifying harm to individuals for the "greater good."
While from a strict utilitarian perspective, it might seem justifiable to misgender someone to save a million lives, many ethical frameworks would argue against it due to the inherent value of respecting individual identities and rights. The scenario underscores the complexity of ethical decision-making and the importance of context, but generally, there is a strong moral imperative to avoid harming individuals, even for significant collective benefits. Ethical judgments often require balancing competing moral principles and are not always clear-cut.
To determine how many sisters Sally has, we can break down the information given in the problem step by step.
Let's denote the sisters as follows:
Since each brother has 2 sisters and Sally is one of them, the other sister must be ( S ). This means that Sally and ( S ) are the only two sisters.
Thus, Sally has 1 sister.
The answer is (\boxed{1}).
By 2035, the film industry is poised to undergo significant transformation due to advancements in AI technologies such as deepfakes, AI actors, and automated script generation. Here are several predictions for how these innovations may reshape the industry:
Enhanced Visual Effects and Deepfakes:
AI Actors:
Script Generation and Story Development:
Personalized Film Experiences:
Ethical and Creative Challenges:
Global Collaboration and Diversity:
Overall, while AI promises to bring efficiencies and new creative possibilities to the film industry by 2035, it will also prompt important discussions about ethics, creativity, and the future role of human artists in an increasingly automated world.
Advertisement
Ladies and gentlemen, ever notice how people treat their phones like they’re precious artifacts? We all have those moments where we swipe and scroll like our lives depend on it. You're on the bus, everyone’s glued to their screens. It's like zombies, but instead of brains, we crave likes and retweets.
And speaking of the bus, public transportation is a whole other comedy show. You ever see someone save a seat for ten stops, only to realize it's for their imaginary friend? Or those awkward moments when you accidentally make eye contact and suddenly you’re both in an unspoken agreement to pretend it never happened. It's like, "I won’t look at you if you don’t look at me. Deal?"
Let’s dive into the world of fitness. Everyone’s got a fitness journey these days. People posting gym selfies like they’re auditioning for a superhero role. I went to the gym last week; I was more out of breath taking off my jacket than actually working out. The real heroes are the ones who remember to bring a water bottle. I bring one, but halfway through, I forget it's mine and start looking for the “free water” station.
Then there’s modern dating. Dating apps have turned romance into a shopping experience. "Swipe right if you like long walks on the beach. Swipe left if you’ve ever been to a beach." You meet someone and the first question is, "So, what's your deal?" It's like a job interview but with more awkward silences and fewer qualifications.
Finally, let’s talk about adulting. Isn’t that a term we all relate to? Paying bills on time feels like winning the lottery, except instead of money, you get the privilege of not having your lights turned off. And cooking—oh, the joys of looking up "easy dinner recipes" and ending up with a kitchen that looks like a tornado hit a grocery store.
So thank you, folks, for coming out. Remember, it’s all about finding humor in the chaos. Stay hilarious!