ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) or Llama 4 Scout?
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Llama 4 Scout
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Our Verdict
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Llama 4 Scout
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Llama 4 Scout is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) uses 94.5x more emoji
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Llama 4 Scout
55%Vocabulary43%
24wSentence Length42w
0.52Hedging0.81
3.3Bold4.1
6.0Lists7.3
0.94Emoji0.00
0.63Headings0.30
0.05Transitions0.04
Based on 15 + 10 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ