ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) or Llama 4 Scout?
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Llama 4 Scout
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 20× input, 30× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Llama 4 Scout is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) uses 94.5x more emoji
