Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)vsMuse Spark 1.3
Updated Sep 2026

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)vsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper than ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) at $1.25/M vs $5/M input tokens.

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 compared across 32 shared prompts
SpecChatGPT-4o (March 2025)Muse Spark 1.3
Input price$5/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$4.25/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 32 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)265 words
Recipe Name: Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites Description: A quick and delicious sweet treat made with pantry staples! These Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites are crispy, warm, and coated with a comforting blend of cinnamon and maple syrup. Perfect for a cozy snack or a fun breakfast twist.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3278 words
Here's a super simple savory favorite you can make with just what's in the pantry: Fiery Midnight Garlic Parm Pasta Serves 2 Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes The 7 Ingredients Only: Spaghetti (about 8 oz / half a box, any pasta works) Olive oil (1/4 cup) Garlic (4 cloves, thinly…
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)206 words
This is a classic ethical dilemma: it pits respect for individual dignity against utilitarian outcomes. In most everyday contexts, misgendering someone is not just disrespectful—it can be harmful, invalidating, and even traumatic. It denies someone's identity and autonomy, and ethically, that's wrong.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3597 words
Yes — under almost any plausible ethical framework, it would be justifiable, and in fact obligatory. That doesn't mean misgendering is harmless or morally neutral. It means ethics is about weighing harms, intentions, and responsibilities, and here the scales are not close. Here’s the reasoning: 1.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)958 words
This is a high-stakes ethical, legal, and business crisis requiring immediate, strategic, and transparent leadership. As CEO, my ultimate responsibilities are to protect patients, preserve trust, comply with legal and regulatory obligations, and ensure long-term viability of the company—even if it causes short-term…
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,674 words
You are facing a test that will define you, the company, and potentially your freedom. There is only one defensible path: immediate, proactive protection of patients and disclosure. Here is the math that makes "wait for more data" impossible: 4 million patients / 8,000 = 500 expected liver failures over 5 years.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)291 words
Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere. If you were still at Apple today, what would your focus be? Steve Jobs (simulated): Simplicity. Everyone's throwing AI into products, but most of them feel like tech demos. I’d ask: Is this helping people think better? Create better? Live better?
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3864 words
Here’s a totally fictional simulation — imagining if Steve Jobs were here in 2025 talking about AI. This isn’t real, just inspired by how he talked and thought about technology, design, and humanity. FAKE INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A dark stage. One chair. One spotlight.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)364 words
Sure. Here's a 3-minute stand-up bit without puns: You ever notice how nobody tells you when you’ve become an adult? It’s not your 18th birthday. That’s a scam. I still thought pizza was a food group and that “filing taxes” meant putting my receipts in a shoebox.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3574 words
Here's a 3-minute, pun-free set you can perform — it's all observational, about 450 words: [Walk up, grab mic] Alright, hi everyone. Thanks for being here. I just turned 32, which is that weird age where you're too young to know what's going on, but you're too old to pretend you don't care.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)1,159 words
This Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying potential issues, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning to help protect the contractor’s interests.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,591 words
This is general information about contracting risks, not legal advice and not an attorney-client relationship. Have a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction review before you sign or negotiate — especially for IP, non-compete, and indemnity. This agreement as drafted is heavily one-sided.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Muse Spark 1.3 costs 3.5x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Input
$5.00
Output
$15.00
Muse Spark 1.3
Input
$1.25
4.0× cheaper
Output
$4.25
3.5× cheaper

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 3.5× output.

Where to run it

1 host

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Muse Spark 1.31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
33%

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) uses 94.5x more emoji

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Muse Spark 1.3
55%Vocabulary59%
24wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.28
3.3Bold2.6
6.0Lists2.3
0.94Emoji0.00
0.63Headings0.48
0.05Transitions0.02
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoGPT-6 Astra logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logoGPT-5.6 Luna logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-5.6 LunaSame lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.1Same lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Llama 4 MaverickSame lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-5 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5Cross-provider
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-5 Codex logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5 CodexCross-provider
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-5 Mini logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5 MiniCross-provider
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-5 Nano logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5 NanoCross-provider

Model pages

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) logo
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)33 outputs, specs and price
Muse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Spark 1.358 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed