Compare Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.7, both from Anthropic, context windows of 100K vs 1.0M, tested across 5 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.7 are both competitive models. Claude 2 costs $11.02/M input tokens vs $5/M for Claude Opus 4.7. Context windows: 100K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 2 is made by anthropic while Claude Opus 4.7 is from anthropic. Claude 2 has a 100K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4.7's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 2 costs $11.02/M input tokens vs $5/M for Claude Opus 4.7.
Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper on both — 2.2× input, 1.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 50.6x more hedging
Compare Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.7, both from Anthropic, context windows of 100K vs 1.0M, tested across 5 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.7 are both competitive models. Claude 2 costs $11.02/M input tokens vs $5/M for Claude Opus 4.7. Context windows: 100K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 2 is made by anthropic while Claude Opus 4.7 is from anthropic. Claude 2 has a 100K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4.7's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 2 costs $11.02/M input tokens vs $5/M for Claude Opus 4.7.
Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper on both — 2.2× input, 1.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 50.6x more hedging