Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Z.AI: GLM 4 32B
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Z.AI: GLM 4 32B by Zhipu AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Z.AI: GLM 4 32B?
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Z.AI: GLM 4 32B are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for Z.AI: GLM 4 32B. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Z.AI: GLM 4 32B
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is from zhipu. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Z.AI: GLM 4 32B's 128K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for Z.AI: GLM 4 32B.
Per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both — 30× input, 150× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B uses 17.3x more bold
