What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta AI. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Llama 4 Maverick's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet or Llama 4 Maverick?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Llama 4 Maverick each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet cost compared to Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is $4.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Llama 4 Maverick on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Llama 4 Maverick across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Apr 2025

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsLlama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $1.5/M vs $6/M input tokens.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Llama 4 Maverick compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet	Llama 4 Maverick
Input price	$6/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Output price	$30/M tokens	$2.5/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	1.0M tokens
Parameters	Not disclosed	17B active (400B total)
Weights	—	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Feb 2025	Apr 2025