Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, in 7 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 86% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 75% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
Llama 4 MaverickRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 7 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 86% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Llama 4 Maverick is 12x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
4.0× cheaper
Output
$2.50
12× cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper on both — 4.0× input, 12× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 2.4x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Llama 4 Maverick
61%Vocabulary42%
49wSentence Length24w
0.64Hedging0.76
2.2Bold3.7
4.5Lists6.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.74
0.21Transitions0.11
Based on 21 + 12 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
