Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, in 327 community votes, gemini 2.5 pro experimental wins 64% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 43 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 60% of votes
Image Generation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 73% of votes
Reasoning: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 93% of votes
Analysis: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 91% of votes
Conversation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 78% of votes
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalWinner
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. In 327 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet for Web Design. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental for Reasoning, Analysis, Conversation. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
3.0× cheaper
Output
$2.00
7.5× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 7.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental uses 4.6x more bold
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length15w
0.99Hedging0.35
1.2Bold5.6
4.3Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.39
0.23Transitions0.17
Based on 13 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
