Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, in 327 community votes, gemini 2.5 pro experimental wins 64% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 43 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is the better choice overall, winning 64% of 327 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. In community voting, In 327 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 64% of head-to-head duels.

In 327 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 64% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental leads in Image Generation, Reasoning, Analysis. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 327+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 60% of votes
Image Generation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 73% of votes
Reasoning: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 93% of votes
Analysis: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 91% of votes
Conversation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 78% of votes
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalWinner
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. In 327 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet for Web Design. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental for Reasoning, Analysis, Conversation. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
88%

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental uses 4.6x more bold

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length15w
0.99Hedging0.35
1.2Bold5.6
4.3Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.39
0.23Transitions0.17
Based on 13 + 18 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions