Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 11 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4o (Omni)?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 90% of 11 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o (Omni)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). In community voting, In 11 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels.
In 11 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 11+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
GPT-4o (Omni) is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 1.5× output
Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet. In 11 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation.
Style Comparison
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
