Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 11 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 40 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4o (Omni)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 90% of 11 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o (Omni)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). In community voting, In 11 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels.

In 11 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 11+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 SonnetWinner
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)Runner-up

Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet. In 11 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 90% of the time. That's not luck.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation.

Clear winner
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetGPT-4o (Omni)
FAQ