Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o mini
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 38 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o mini are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4o mini
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4o mini is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4o miniRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
GPT-4o mini is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
94%
GPT-4o mini uses 3.2x more bold
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4o mini
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length18w
0.99Hedging0.84
1.2Bold3.8
4.3Lists3.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings1.03
0.23Transitions0.23
Based on 13 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ