Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1-Codex
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-5.1-Codex by OpenAI, in 9 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet wins 57% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 400K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.1-Codex?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 57% of 9 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5.1-Codex. Context windows: 200K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.1-Codex
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-5.1-Codex is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-5.1-Codex's 400K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5.1-Codex. In community voting, In 9 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 57% of head-to-head duels.
In 9 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 57% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 9+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge overall. In 9 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 57% of the time.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 3.5x more headings
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.






