Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 400K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini. Context windows: 200K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's 400K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 23.0x more headings
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.








