Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 33 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is from moonshotai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct.

Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
FAQ