What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is developed by Moonshot AI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 35 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 35 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude 3.7 Sonnet cost compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs $0.3/M input tokens. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is $2.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is developed by Moonshot AI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 35 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 35 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude 3.7 Sonnet cost compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs $0.3/M input tokens. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is $2.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct: Which Is Better?

Updated Nov 2025

Our Verdict

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Input

$0.30

10× cheaper

Output

$0.60

25× cheaper

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 10× input, 25× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

41%

Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 5.2x more hedging

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

62%Vocabulary63%

35wSentence Length15w

0.99Hedging0.19

1.2Bold5.2

4.3Lists3.2

0.00Emoji0.00

1.78Headings0.38

0.23Transitions0.05

Based on 13 + 14 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5New provider

Updated Nov 2025

Our Verdict

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Input

$0.30

10× cheaper

Output

$0.60

25× cheaper

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 10× input, 25× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

41%

Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 5.2x more hedging

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

62%Vocabulary63%

35wSentence Length15w

0.99Hedging0.19

1.2Bold5.2

4.3Lists3.2

0.00Emoji0.00

1.78Headings0.38

0.23Transitions0.05

Based on 13 + 14 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5New provider