Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is from moonshotai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct.
Per 1M tokens
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 10× input, 25× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 5.2x more hedging
