Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.
MiniMax M1 is cheaper on both — 10× input, 9.1× output
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
MiniMax M1 is 9.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.
MiniMax M1 is cheaper on both — 10× input, 9.1× output
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
MiniMax M1 is 9.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji