Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiniMax M2-her by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 66K, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiniMax M2-her are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M2-her. Context windows: 200K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiniMax M2-her is from minimax. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M2-her's 66K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M2-her.
MiniMax M2-her is cheaper on both — 10× input, 13× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiniMax M2-her is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M2-her uses 96.5x more emoji
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiniMax M2-her by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 66K, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiniMax M2-her are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M2-her. Context windows: 200K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiniMax M2-her is from minimax. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M2-her's 66K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M2-her.
MiniMax M2-her is cheaper on both — 10× input, 13× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiniMax M2-her is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M2-her uses 96.5x more emoji