Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen Plus 0728 by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen Plus 0728 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Qwen Plus 0728 is from qwen. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728.
Qwen Plus 0728 is cheaper on both — 7.5× input, 13× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen Plus 0728 is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen Plus 0728 uses 67.5x more emoji
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen Plus 0728 by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen Plus 0728 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Qwen Plus 0728 is from qwen. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728.
Qwen Plus 0728 is cheaper on both — 7.5× input, 13× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen Plus 0728 is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen Plus 0728 uses 67.5x more emoji