Claude Sonnet 4.5vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 at $0.11/M vs $3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 3 categories, Web Design by the widest margin. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 25x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
27× cheaper
Output
$0.60
25× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 27× input, 25× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 6.6x more sentence length
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
64%Vocabulary56%
94wSentence Length14w
0.48Hedging0.37
4.9Bold5.7
8.0Lists4.0
0.45Emoji0.54
1.91Headings0.70
0.07Transitions0.14
Based on 20 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.6Cross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.7Cross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.8Cross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5Cross-provider