Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against GLM 4.7 Flash by Zhipu AI, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.7 Flash are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.7 Flash
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while GLM 4.7 Flash is from zhipu. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
GLM 4.7 Flash
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GLM 4.7 Flash is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
76%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 20.4x more emoji
Claude Haiku 4.5
GLM 4.7 Flash
61%Vocabulary52%
47wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.33
5.1Bold5.8
6.3Lists4.7
0.20Emoji0.00
2.46Headings0.68
0.17Transitions0.13
Based on 24 + 19 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ