Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 Coder
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Qwen3 Coder by Qwen, in 3 community votes, claude haiku 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 Coder?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Qwen3 Coder is from qwen. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. In community voting, In 3 community votes, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 3 community votes, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder are tied
Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5Winner
Qwen3 CoderRunner-up
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5. In 3 blind votes, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 Coder is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 1.8x more emoji
Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3 Coder
61%Vocabulary61%
47wSentence Length72w
0.64Hedging0.61
5.1Bold4.7
6.3Lists5.6
0.20Emoji0.12
2.46Headings1.43
0.17Transitions0.20
Based on 24 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ