Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 Max by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 256K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen: Qwen3 Max?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max. Context windows: 200K vs 256K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 Max is from qwen. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max's 256K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max.
Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen: Qwen3 Max
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 3.1x more headings
Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen: Qwen3 Max
61%Vocabulary60%
47wSentence Length28w
0.64Hedging0.48
5.1Bold5.7
6.3Lists4.1
0.20Emoji0.45
2.46Headings0.78
0.17Transitions0.18
Based on 24 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ