Claude Haiku 4.5 vs QwQ 32B

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against QwQ 32B by Qwen, in 1 community votes, claude haiku 4.5 and qwq 32b are closely matched, context windows of 200K vs 40K, tested across 15 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or QwQ 32B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and QwQ 32B are closely matched based on 1 community votes. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 200K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and QwQ 32B

Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while QwQ 32B is from qwen. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Claude Haiku 4.5 and QwQ 32B are closely matched.

In 1 community votes, Claude Haiku 4.5 and QwQ 32B are closely matched. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5Winner
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32BRunner-up

Votes are tied. Claude Haiku 4.5 is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.

QwQ 32B is 3.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
95%

Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 20.4x more emoji

Claude Haiku 4.5
QwQ 32B
61%Vocabulary64%
47wSentence Length12w
0.64Hedging0.36
5.1Bold13.6
6.3Lists8.4
0.20Emoji0.00
2.46Headings0.00
0.17Transitions0.39
Based on 24 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Haiku 4.5QwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions