Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI, in 25 community votes, claude opus 4.1 and gemini 2.5 pro preview 06-05 are closely matched, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?
Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are closely matched based on 25 community votes. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is from google. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. In community voting, In 25 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are closely matched.
In 25 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are closely matched. Claude Opus 4.1 leads in Web Design, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads in Analysis. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 25+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is cheaper on both — 12× input, 7.5× output
Too close to call. Pick based on your use case.
Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for Web Design. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for Analysis. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
