Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against GPT-5 by OpenAI, in 104 community votes, claude opus 4.1 wins 58% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 400K, tested across 27 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 58% of 104 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 200K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while GPT-5 is from openai. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. In community voting, In 104 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 58% of head-to-head duels.
In 104 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 58% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4.1 leads in Web Design, Conversation, while GPT-5 leads in Image Generation, Reasoning, Analysis. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 104+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Claude Opus 4.1. In 104 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 58% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for Web Design, Conversation. Pick GPT-5 for Reasoning, Analysis, Image Generation. GPT-5 is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.




