What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 36 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 36 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is $15.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Aug 2025

Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.00015/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 compared across 36 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Opus 4.1	Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.00015/M tokens
Output price	$75/M tokens	$0.00085/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	—
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Aug 2025	Jul 2025