Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 2 community votes, claude opus 4.1 and qwen: qwen3 235b a22b 2507 are closely matched, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?
Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 are closely matched based on 2 community votes. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In community voting, In 2 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 are closely matched.
In 2 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 are closely matched. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 100000× input, 88235× output
Genuinely even. Both are strong choices.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 88235x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.8x more sentence length
