What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and QwQ 32B?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while QwQ 32B is developed by Qwen. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs QwQ 32B's 40K. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or QwQ 32B?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and QwQ 32B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to QwQ 32B?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and QwQ 32B costs $0.5/M input tokens. QwQ 32B is $14.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and QwQ 32B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and QwQ 32B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Aug 2025

Claude Opus 4.1vsQwQ 32B

QwQ 32B is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.5/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1 and QwQ 32B compared across 15 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Opus 4.1	QwQ 32B
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.5/M tokens
Output price	$75/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	40K tokens
Parameters	Not disclosed	32B
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Aug 2025	Mar 2025