Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) by DeepSeek, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)?

Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V3 (March 2024). Context windows: 1000K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)

Claude Opus 4.6 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) is from deepseek. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)'s 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V3 (March 2024).

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) is 89x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) uses 2.8x more transitions

Claude Opus 4.6
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)
53%Vocabulary58%
35wSentence Length18w
0.68Hedging0.73
5.2Bold7.5
2.9Lists7.6
0.21Emoji0.26
1.34Headings1.60
0.03Transitions0.08
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions