Claude Opus 4.6 vs Z.AI: GLM 4.7
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against Z.AI: GLM 4.7 by OpenRouter, in 30 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.7 wins 56% of head-to-head duels, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Z.AI: GLM 4.7 wins 72% of votes
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 71% of votes
Conversation: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Z.AI: GLM 4.7Winner
Claude Opus 4.6Runner-up
Z.AI: GLM 4.7 has the edge overall. In 30 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.7 wins 56% of the time.
Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for Conversation, Image Generation. Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.7 for Web Design.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Z.AI: GLM 4.7
Input
—
Output
—
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Z.AI: GLM 4.7 uses 2.9x more transitions
Claude Opus 4.6
Z.AI: GLM 4.7
53%Vocabulary53%
35wSentence Length16w
0.68Hedging0.28
5.2Bold5.7
2.9Lists4.2
0.21Emoji0.12
1.34Headings0.52
0.03Transitions0.08
Based on 23 + 21 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
