Claude Opus 4.6
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4o mini
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, in 1 community votes, claude opus 4.6 and gpt-4o mini are closely matched, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o mini?
Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4o mini are closely matched based on 1 community votes. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini. Context windows: 1000K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4o mini
Claude Opus 4.6 is made by anthropic while GPT-4o mini is from openai. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4o mini are closely matched.
In 1 community votes, Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4o mini are closely matched. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6Winner
GPT-4o miniRunner-up
Votes are tied. Claude Opus 4.6 is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.
GPT-4o mini is 42x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
94%
Claude Opus 4.6 uses 20.7x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-4o mini
53%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length18w
0.68Hedging0.84
5.2Bold3.8
2.9Lists3.3
0.21Emoji0.00
1.34Headings1.03
0.03Transitions0.23
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ