Claude Opus 4.6vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0.00015/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.00015/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $0.00085/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | — |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs 29412x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
33333× cheaper
Output
$0.001
29412× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both: 33333× input, 29412× output.
Where to run it
14 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.6x more transitions
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
56%Vocabulary57%
33wSentence Length18w
0.73Hedging0.40
5.3Bold5.9
2.7Lists4.8
1.16Emoji0.45
1.23Headings1.07
0.02Transitions0.11
Based on 26 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Grok 4.3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Grok 4.5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Grok 4.6New provider
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok Code Fast 1New provider