Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.6vsSolar Pro 4
Updated Aug 2026

Claude Opus 4.6vsSolar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0.09/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6 and Solar Pro 4 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.6Solar Pro 4
Input price$5/M tokens$0.09/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens$0.36/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens524K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Claude Opus 4.62,995 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Immediate Disclosure Path My Governing Principle Before the hour-by-hour plan, I need to state the decision framework clearly: patient safety is not one consideration among many—it is the constraint that every other consideration must satisfy.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,851 words
As CEO, my overriding duty is to balance patient safety, legal/regulatory compliance, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term corporate survival. A 1-in-8,000 risk of liver failure is rare but severe, potentially fatal, and materially unexpected relative to the current label.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 4.6215 words
✨ Golden Honey-Garlic Crispy Rice Bites ✨ Ingredients Rice (2 cups, cooked and cooled — ideally day-old) Soy sauce (3 tablespoons) Honey (2 tablespoons) Garlic (3 cloves, minced) Olive oil (3 tablespoons) Sesame seeds (1 tablespoon) Red pepper flakes (½ teaspoon) Instructions Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4294 words
🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude Opus 4.61,677 words
How Large Language Models Learn and Generate Text For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training an LLM as building the world's most aggressively optimized compression algorithm, except instead of compressing files, it's compressing the statistical structure of human language.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,062 words
The Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model not as a reasoning engine, but as a highly compressed, non-deterministic function approximator that maps a sequence of input tokens to a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 4.61,400 words
Comprehensive Architecture Review: Real-time Collaborative Document Editor This architecture has several critical flaws that would cause data loss, inconsistency, and poor user experience at scale. I'll work through every layer systematically.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,598 words
This architecture contains several fundamental mismatches between real-time collaborative editing requirements and the chosen patterns. Below is a systematic breakdown of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, each with a targeted solution and explicit trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude Opus 4.61,395 words
Critical Analysis of MindMeld AI Pitch Deck After careful examination, here are the three weakest claims, ranked by severity: The 94% Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) — Most Problematic Why this is weak: This claim strains credulity against the entire body of published BCI research, and the lack of context makes it essentially…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,009 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine credibility and specific recommendations for improvement. The Technical Performance Claim Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy...
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Claude Opus 4.61,325 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO LedgerLift (LLLT) B2B Spend Management & AP Automation SaaS Date: June 2025 Analyst: [Redacted] Sector: Vertical SaaS / Fintech Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION LONG 12-Month Price Target: $62–$78 (Base–Bull) Current: $46 Upside: 35–70% Thesis: LedgerLift is a durable mid-market compounder with…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,052 words
INTERNAL MEMO – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE TO: IC Members FROM: Long/Short Equity Desk DATE: Oct 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation / Long Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $52–$58 (Base case ~$54, Bull ~$68, Bear ~$38) Thesis: LedgerLift is a structurally advantaged mid-market AP…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Solar Pro 4 costs 69x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Solar Pro 4
Input
$0.09
56× cheaper
Output
$0.36
69× cheaper

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on both: 56× input, 69× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Opus 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.4% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.6% upAnthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
Solar Pro 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.09 in·$0.36 out·524k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.6 and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 is $4.91/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 4.6 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoHy3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.6 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.6 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.6 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 4.6 logoClaude Sonnet 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Version compare
Claude Opus 4.6 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoSeed 2.0 Code logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Seed 2.0 CodeSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoSeed 2.0 Lite logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Seed 2.0 LiteNew provider
Solar Pro 4 logoSeed 2.1 Turbo logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Seed 2.1 TurboSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoSherlock Dash Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Sherlock Dash AlphaNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.657 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 4 logo
Solar Pro 414 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed