Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max by Qwen, in 19 community votes, qwen: qwen3.7 max wins 69% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max wins 67% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max wins 75% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.7 MaxWinner
Claude Opus 4.8Runner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max. In 19 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max wins 69% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is 3.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
Input
$2.50
2.0× cheaper
Output
$7.50
3.3× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 3.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Claude Opus 4.8 uses 5.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
60%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length19w
0.46Hedging0.22
4.7Bold5.0
3.2Lists2.5
0.78Emoji0.15
1.15Headings0.91
0.04Transitions0.11
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
