Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Claude Opus 5 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, tested across 36 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 5 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 29412x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 5
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
33333× cheaper
Output
$0.001
29412× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 33333× input, 29412× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 26.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 5
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
54%Vocabulary57%
21wSentence Length18w
0.40Hedging0.40
3.9Bold5.9
1.9Lists4.8
0.02Emoji0.45
0.71Headings1.07
0.05Transitions0.11
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
