Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI o4 Mini High

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic against OpenAI o4 Mini High by OpenAI, context windows of 1.0M vs 200K, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or OpenAI o4 Mini High?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI o4 Mini High are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High. Context windows: 1000K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI o4 Mini High

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by anthropic while OpenAI o4 Mini High is from openai. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to OpenAI o4 Mini High's 200K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High.

Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI o4 Mini High
OpenAI o4 Mini HighRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

OpenAI o4 Mini High is 3.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
50%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 uses 507.4x more bold

Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI o4 Mini High
56%Vocabulary70%
36wSentence Length18w
0.53Hedging0.33
5.1Bold0.0
3.4Lists1.3
0.19Emoji0.02
2.10Headings0.00
0.02Transitions0.04
Based on 23 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 4.6OpenAI o4 Mini High

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions