Claude Sonnet 4.6vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $0.15/M vs $3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 10x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
20× cheaper
Output
$1.50
10× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 20× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
56%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 5.2x more transitions
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
56%Vocabulary54%
36wSentence Length16w
0.53Hedging0.31
5.1Bold6.0
3.4Lists4.5
0.19Emoji0.58
2.10Headings0.88
0.02Transitions0.10
Based on 23 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4Cross-provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Mistral Medium 3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Mistral Medium 3.1New provider
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral NemoNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Mistral Small 4New provider