Claude Sonnet 4.6vsQwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $0.1612/M vs $3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.1612/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.9653/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Apr 2026 |
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3.6 35B A3BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 16x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
19× cheaper
Output
$0.97
16× cheaper
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on both: 19× input, 16× output.
Where to run it
14 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
43%
Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 8.4x more emoji
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
56%Vocabulary59%
36wSentence Length15w
0.53Hedging0.31
5.1Bold4.9
3.4Lists2.7
0.19Emoji1.60
2.10Headings0.75
0.02Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 FlashNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731New provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 ProNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider